首页> 外文会议>Hydrovision International >Li-Ion Battery versus Pumped Storage for Bulk Energy Storage - A Comparison of Raw Material, Investment Costs and CO2-Footprints
【24h】

Li-Ion Battery versus Pumped Storage for Bulk Energy Storage - A Comparison of Raw Material, Investment Costs and CO2-Footprints

机译:锂离子电池与批量储能的泵送存储 - 原料,投资成本和二氧化碳脚印的比较

获取原文

摘要

The balancing of load and generation is a major challenge in electricity systems shaped by renewable energy sources. In this context, large-scale storage systems as a temporal flexibility option contribute to the balancing process by participating in portfolio management, energy only markets as well as system reserve markets. Over the past years particularly battery storages experienced a tremendous ‘hype’ in public discussions due to technological innovation and a significant cost decrease. As a result, several new stationary battery storages in the order of magnitude of hundreds of megawatt hours have been constructed during the last decade. However, the question remains whether the falling costs of a stationary battery storage can be competitive with well-established technologies such as pumped storage hydro. This paper compares the marginal costs given by the specific raw material costs of a representative stationary battery storage with the respective costs of a pumped storage scheme. It is evident that both systems need completely different types and quantities of resources leading to substantial differences in their specific raw material costs. In addition to the raw material costs, annual lifetime investment costs and land requirements for both technologies were examined. Finally, the different contributions to the over-all CO2-footprint are analyzed. This paper, consequently, contributes to the ongoing and controversial discussions around the different storage technologies for stationary application with respect to their economic efficiency and their environmental impact.
机译:负荷和生成的平衡是可再生能源形状的电力系统的主要挑战。在这种情况下,大规模存储系统作为一个时间灵活性选项,通过参与投资组合管理,Energy Energy和系统储备市场来贡献平衡过程。过去几年,由于技术创新,在公共讨论中,在公共讨论中经历了巨大的“炒作”。因此,在过去十年中建造了几个数百兆瓦的几个新的固定电池储存。但是,问题仍然是固定电池存储的成本是否可以与诸如泵浦存储水电等良好的技术竞争。本文比较了具有泵浦存储方案的各个成本的代表性固定电池存储器的特定原料成本给出的边际成本。很明显,两种系统都需要完全不同的类型和数量的资源,导致其特定原料成本的实质性差异。除原料成本外,还检查了两年终身投资成本和两种技术的土地要求。最后,分析了对所有二氧化碳占地面积的不同贡献。因此,本文有助于围绕其经济效率及其环境影响的持续存储技术讨论不同存储技术的持续和争议讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号