首页> 外文会议>International Early Research Career Enhancement School on Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures >On Alternative Instruments for the fMRI Data Analysis: General Linear Model Versus Algebraic Topology Approach
【24h】

On Alternative Instruments for the fMRI Data Analysis: General Linear Model Versus Algebraic Topology Approach

机译:关于FMRI数据分析的替代仪器:一般线性模型与代数拓扑方法

获取原文

摘要

This work aimed at comparing two different approaches (classical general linear model based on the Bayesian approach and the method of algebraic topology) for fMRI data processing in a simple motor task. Subjects imposes block paradigm, consisting of three identical blocks. The duration of each block was 40 s (20 s of rest and 20 s of right hand fingers busting). To obtain statistically significant results were carried out 20 sessions of experiment. The results obtained by both methods were very close to each other, but correspondence between statistically significant changes in BOLD-signal was not quite complete. TDA (topologic data analyses) allocated additional voxels in Post central gyrus right. This region could be revealed with the changing in the level of confidence in the GLM model, but with this lower level of confidence too much additional voxels appeared. Combination of two approaches could be used for verification of results.
机译:这项工作旨在比较两种不同的方法(基于贝叶斯方法的经典一般线性模型和代数拓扑方法),在简单的电机任务中进行FMRI数据处理。 受试者施加块范式,由三个相同的块组成。 每个块的持续时间为40秒(休息20秒,右手手指的20秒)。 为了获得统计学上显着的结果,进行了20个实验会。 两种方法获得的结果彼此非常接近,但粗体信号的统计上显着变化之间的对应性并不完整。 TDA(拓扑数据分析)在中央回物后右派分配额外的体素。 该地区可以随着GLM模型的信心水平而变化,但随着这种较低的置信度较低的额外的体素出现了。 两种方法的组合可用于验证结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号