首页> 外文会议>Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition Conference >Structurally-Enhanced Carbonate Matrix Reservoirs: Utilising Tailored Conceptual Models and Relative Deformed Reservoir Rock Volumes to Understand Flow Behaviour, Fracture Modelling Requirement, and Potential Development Pitfalls
【24h】

Structurally-Enhanced Carbonate Matrix Reservoirs: Utilising Tailored Conceptual Models and Relative Deformed Reservoir Rock Volumes to Understand Flow Behaviour, Fracture Modelling Requirement, and Potential Development Pitfalls

机译:结构增强的碳酸酯基质储层:利用量身定制的概念模型和相对变形的水库岩石体积,了解流动行为,裂缝建模要求和潜在的发展陷阱

获取原文

摘要

Structural characterization of faults and fractures is a key component of reservoir description, however, data consolidation often does not allow decisions on modelling or explanation of fluid flow anomalies. For the task of assessing fracture modelling need, data has often not been gathered systematically. Most carbonate fields’ models in the area require permeability modification/enhancement but where do these sit with regard to K multiplier modifications versus DFN models, for example? A key conundrum i s that most conventional UAE hydrocarbon fields would, according to the Nelson (2001) classification, be matrix-dominated reservoirs with fracture enhancement within comparatively open, low-strain, 4-way dip-closed structures, making them theoretically marginal to fracture involvement. However, within stacked sequences of contiguous reservoirs, or due to fault damage zone associated fracturing effects, the specific classification of individual zones within a field may vary between entirely matrix-dominated to highly fracture-dominated reservoirs. It then becomes difficult to determine whether fracture modelling or proxy methods of enhancing permeability is the appropriate practical way forward. This paper addresses a means to assess this need, based on conceptual models and relative deformed rock volume. A means to pre-assess the need for fracture modelling and to understand the role and need for fracture assessment is a key first step founded on basic structural principles and data. A set of Early Cretaceous reservoirs from a supergiant offshore Abu Dhabi oilfield, as well as single reservoir examples country-wide, are utilised to illustrate this concept. Building conceptual models involves collaborative structural geology to develop a concept, including static and dynamic data relevant to the structural components present at all scales (faults, fracture corridors, layer-related mechanical fractures). The concept may include fault character and temporal evolution, along with dynamic data for understanding connected flow paths as much as possible. Once built, variants can be generated around the base case, reflecting uncertainty of structural aspects or specific sub-zone nuances. A series of conceptual models considers the variation between different stacked reservoirs and end-member variants for a given single reservoir within different structural domains or different traps. Comparing the conceptual models with standard ‘fractured field’ classifications allows determination of the type of reservoir (Nelson, 2001, scheme) and hence likelihood to requiring modelling by fracture enhanced K-multipliers, DFNs, or dual-media models. Assessing the level of deformation, as a bulk strain within a carbonate reservoir, provides a ‘relative deformation volume’. Proportionally, this is the volume of rock within the reservoir that contains visible or mapped deformation, as per conceptual model features, where at least a component of fluid flow would be controlled by such discontinuities. Assessment can be for an entire field, for specific reservoir(s), or for a specific geologically defined flow domain, and offers unhindered comparisons. Analysis of a series of different stacked reservoirs, with varying matrix properties, in the same field, are ranked according to deformed volume, which shows relationships with (a) dominance of fractured layers and (b) water cut evolution and hence future field development options. Visual assessment of the conceptual model allows differences between reservoirs and variants within a reservoir that reflect different effects of structure (e.g. trap shape, fault-proximal effects) to be compared. Using conceptual models with relative deformation levels, the appropriate need and means of fracture modelling can be quickly established.
机译:故障和裂缝的结构表征是储层描述的关键组成部分,然而,数据整合通常不允许关于流体流动异常的建模或解释的决定。对于评估骨折建模需要的任务,数据通常不会系统地收集。大多数碳酸盐田的模型在该地区需要渗透性修改/增强,但是这些坐在k乘法器修改方面,例如DFN模型,例如?根据纳尔逊(2001)分类,大多数常规的阿联酋烃场将根据纳尔逊(2001)分类,是在比较开放,低应变,4路倾闭结构内具有骨折增强的矩阵主导的储层,使其理论上是边缘的骨折参与。然而,在连续储存器的堆叠序列中,或由于故障损伤区域相关的压裂效果,场内的各个区域的具体分类可以在完全基质主导到高度骨折主导的储存器之间变化。然后变得难以确定是否有抗渗透性的裂缝建模或代理方法是正常的适当实用方式。本文根据概念模型和相对变形的岩石体积来解决评估这种需求的手段。一种预先评估裂缝建模的方法和了解骨折评估的方法是基本结构原理和数据的主要第一步。来自Supergiant Offshore Abu Dhabi油田的一套早期白垩纪储层,以及单一的水库示例,用于说明这一概念。建立概念模型涉及协作结构地质,开发一个概念,包括与所有尺度(故障,断裂走廊,与与相关机械骨折)存在的结构部件相关的静态和动态数据。该概念可以包括故障字符和时间演进,以及用于理解连接的流路径尽可能多的动态数据。一旦构建,可以在基本情况下产生变型,反映了结构方面或特定子区细微差别的不确定性。一系列概念模型认为在不同的结构域内或不同陷阱中的给定单个储存器的不同堆叠储存器和最终构件变体之间的变化。将概念模型与标准的“裂缝”分类​​进行比较,允许确定储层类型(纳尔逊,2001,方案),从而确定需要通过裂缝增强型K乘法器,DFN或双媒体模型建模的可能性。评估变形水平,作为碳酸盐储层内的散装菌株,提供了“相对变形体积”。按比例地,这是储存器内的岩石的体积,其含有可见或映射变形,根据概念模型特征,其中至少一种流体流动的组分将由这种不连续性控制。评估可以是整个领域,用于特定储层,或用于特定地质定义的流动域,并提供不受阻碍的比较。在相同的领域中分析一系列不同的堆叠储存器,在相同的领域中,在相同的领域中排序,这表明了与(a)裂缝层的主导地位的关系和(b)水切换的关系,因此将来的现场开发选择。视觉评估概念模型允许比较结构(例如陷阱形状,故障近端效应)的不同效果的水库内的储层和变体之间的差异。使用具有相对变形水平的概念模型,可以快速建立适当的需求和裂缝建模的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号