首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning >Performance Comparison between an Absorption-compression Hybrid Refrigeration System and a Double-effect Absorption Refrigeration Sys-tem
【24h】

Performance Comparison between an Absorption-compression Hybrid Refrigeration System and a Double-effect Absorption Refrigeration Sys-tem

机译:吸收压缩混合制冷系统与双效吸收制冷系统的性能比较

获取原文

摘要

Conventional absorption refrigeration systems (ARSs), which are mainly driven by heat, have a competitive primary energy efficiency (PEE) compared with chillers driven by electricity. In the typical ARS, a large quantity of high-temperature heat is supplied into the generator, while a substantial amount of low-temperature heat is rejected to the environment from the condenser, it's a huge waste. In order to decrease the input heat for generator and enhance the performance of conventional ARS, a kind of absorption-compression hybrid refrigeration system recovering condensation heat for generation (RCHG-ARS) was ever proposed. In the present study, the models of both RCHG-ARS and double-effect absorption refrigeration system (DEARS) are established, and the effects of different parameters on them are simulated and compared with each other. As a conclusion, the PEE of RCHG-ARS can be 29.0% higher than that of DEARS, and RCHG-ARS has a wider working conditions than DEARS due to the existence of the compressor.
机译:与电力驱动的冷却器相比,主要由热量驱动的常规吸收制冷系统(ARSS)具有竞争力的主要能源效率(小便)。在典型的ARS中,将大量的高温热量供应到发电机中,而从冷凝器中拒绝大量的低温热量,这是一个巨大的废物。为了降低发电机的输入热量,提高常规AR的性能,曾提出过一种吸收 - 压缩混合制冷系统,其恢复发电(RCHG-ARS)的凝结热量。在本研究中,建立了RCHG-AR和双效吸收制冷系统(DEARS)的模型,并模拟了不同参数对它们的影响。作为结论,RCHG-AR的小便可以比亲爱的尿道高29.0%,而Rchg-Ars由于压缩机的存在而比亲爱的更广泛的工作条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号