首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Social Science >Kelompok Usaha Bersama (KUBE) And Poverty Level Performance In Sulawesi and Kalimantan Areas
【24h】

Kelompok Usaha Bersama (KUBE) And Poverty Level Performance In Sulawesi and Kalimantan Areas

机译:苏拉威西和加里曼丹地区的克洛波克-乌萨哈-贝尔萨马(KUBE)和贫困水平表现

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Poverty is a nightmare that is very scary for the world's population and one of the global issues in every country that is developing and growing and poverty is where a person has a condition that is not mimiliki sufficient resources and income, so the lack of basic necessities such as clothing, shelter, nutritious meals, clean water, and health care. To address the issue of poverty government programs have been rolled out to the poor one of which is a program addressing poverty through the Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia kelompok usaha bersama (KUBE). Article aims to determine the effect of directly or indirectly variable budgets, experience, old school and the facilitation of the provincial poverty rate in the region of Sulawesi and Borneo islands through increased revenue. This study uses data regarding the number of members of KUBE budget recipients, Experience, Old School, Facilitation and Revenue KUBE members, to determine the independent variables (Budget, Experience, Old School and Facilitation) and intervening variables (income) and the dependent variable (Poverty). Budgets are directly variable (X1), Experience (X2), Old School (X3), Facilitation (X4) significantly affect poverty (Y2). While it indirectly through the variable income (Y1), budget variables influence significantly to poverty. While the experience variable, Old School, Facilitation no significant effect on poverty (Y2). It was concluded that Influence the Budget directly to poverty and significant positive effect but indirectly influence the budget to poverty through income positive and significant impact. While the influence of experience, old school, and facilitation directly to poverty have a significant negative effect whereas the effect of indirectly Old School to poverty through income had no significant effect.
机译:贫困是一场噩梦,对世界人口来说是非常可怕的,也是每一个正在发展和增长的国家的全球性问题之一。贫困是指一个人没有足够的资源和收入,因此缺乏衣服、住所、营养餐、清洁水和医疗保健等基本必需品。为了解决贫困问题,政府向穷人推出了一些项目,其中一个项目是通过印度尼西亚共和国社会事务部的kelompok usaha bersama(KUBE)解决贫困问题的项目。本文旨在确定直接或间接可变预算、经验、旧学校以及通过增加收入促进苏拉威西岛和婆罗洲群岛地区省级贫困率的影响。本研究使用有关库布预算接受者、经验、老学校、便利化和收入库布成员人数的数据,以确定自变量(预算、经验、老学校和便利化)、干预变量(收入)和因变量(贫困)。预算是直接可变的(X1),经验(X2),老学校(X3),便利化(X4),显著影响贫困(Y2)。预算变量通过可变收入(Y1)间接影响贫困。而经验变量、老派、便利化对贫困(Y2)没有显著影响。得出的结论是,预算直接影响贫困和显著的正效应,但通过收入间接影响贫困和显著的正效应。而经验、老校和便利化直接对贫困有显著的负面影响,而通过收入间接影响贫困的老校没有显著影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号