首页> 外文会议>International Multidisciplinary Microscopy and Microanalysis Congress >Measuring the Degree of Sensitization (DOS) Using an Electrochemical Technique
【24h】

Measuring the Degree of Sensitization (DOS) Using an Electrochemical Technique

机译:使用电化学技术测量敏化度(DOS)

获取原文

摘要

Sensitization can be simply defined as the susceptibility of an alloy, specifically austenitic stainless steel, to corrosion at grain boundaries. A detailed study on types 304 stainless steel has been carried out to correlate the degree of sensitization measured by electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation test (EPR) with the susceptibility to intergranular corrosion. In this study four different heat treatments were given to alloys, i.e., solution annealed (SA) at 1020 °C for 1 h, then quenched in water; also then heat-treated in air at 620 °C for 15, 30, and 60 min. The electrolyte for the EPR tests was 1.0 N H_2SO_4 solution containing 0.01 M KSCN. Potentiodynamic curves from passive to active regions in deaerated solution at room temperature were obtained at a scan rate of 1.67 mV/s (6 V/h), after the passivation at 200 mV versus (SCE) for 2 min then the polarization was conducted. The criterion used to distinguish between sensitized and non-sensitized specimens is the activation charge Pa, the peak current density, Ph, in the active state, and Flade potential Ef at which the active curve breaks upward. The results indicated that the longer the sensitization time the higher the activation charge (Pa), and the higher the peak current density in the active state (Ph). The results indicated that, the EPR is more sensitive than the chemical method for measuring the degree of sensitization.
机译:致敏可以简单地定义为合金,特别是奥氏体不锈钢的易感性,在晶界腐蚀。已经进行了对304型不锈钢的详细研究,以将通过电化学型电压再活化试验(EPR)测量的敏化程度与骨间腐蚀的敏感性相关联。在这项研究中,将四种不同的热处理给合金,即在1020℃下退火(SA)1小时,然后在水中淬灭;然后在620℃下在空气中进行热处理15,30和60分钟。 EPR测试的电解质为1.0N H_2SO_4溶液,含有0.01M KSCn。以1.67mV / s(6V / h)的扫描速率在室温下从脱气的溶液中被无源地区的电位动力学曲线,在200mV与(SCE)的钝化后2分钟,然后进行极化。用于区分敏化和非敏化样本的标准是活化电荷Pa,峰值电流密度,pH,在活性状态下,并且活性曲线向上突破的翼片电位Ef。结果表明,敏化时间越长,激活电荷(PA)越高,活性状态(pH)中的峰值电流密度越高。结果表明,EPR比测量致敏程度的化学方法更敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号