首页> 外文会议>SPE Western Regional Meeting >Heavy Oil Mobilization by Cold Solvent, Hot Solvent, and Heat-A Comparative Pore Level Evaluation
【24h】

Heavy Oil Mobilization by Cold Solvent, Hot Solvent, and Heat-A Comparative Pore Level Evaluation

机译:冷溶剂,热溶剂和热 - 一种对比较孔径评价的重型油

获取原文

摘要

The first commercial test of solvents took place in California in 1960 where solvent stimulation was used to increase production of heavy oil. Currently, successful performance of steam injection in horizontal wells suggests the idea of using hot solvent alone or in conjunction with steam to reduce bitumen viscosity. The present study compares the performance of heat, cold solvent, and hot solvent for reducing bitumen viscosity at the pore scale using typical field data. The governing equations were derived for heat transport by conduction and convection and solvent diffusion and dispersion. The equations were solved in spherical geometry for a droplet of bitumen at different flow rates. In addition to solvent and steam together, equations were derived for a hot solvent. The mass and heat balance equations were solved simultaneously and the viscosity profile was obtained. The performance of different solvents at different temperatures was compared with heat under the same conditions. The results indicated that hot solvent is much more effective than solvent alone due to the effect of temperature on oil viscosity. It was found that the effect of solvent is much less than that of heat and that the high recovery by heated solvent is directly related to the heat. The time required for cold solvent to reduce bitumen viscosity was much longer compared to conduction-convective heating even at high solvent rates. Hot solvent shows promise compared with conduction-convective heating as a result of the heat contribution. In spite of the benefits of using solvent, the economics must be considered. This study improves our understanding of the mechanistic behavior of solvent assisted recovery processes and modelling approaches at the pore scale.
机译:在1960年加利福尼亚州的第一次商业考试发生在加利福尼亚州,其中使用溶剂刺激来增加重油的产生。目前,水平井中蒸汽注射的成功表现表明,单独使用热溶剂或与蒸汽结合以减少沥青粘度的想法。本研究比较了使用典型场数据在孔隙秤上降低沥青粘度的热量,冷溶剂和热溶剂的性能。通过传导和对流和溶剂扩散和分散来源的控制方程。在不同流速下的沥青的球形几何形状中求解方程。除了溶剂和蒸汽在一起之外,可以为热溶剂衍生方程。同时溶解质量和热平衡方程,得到粘度曲线。在不同条件下将不同温度下的不同溶剂的性能进行比较。结果表明,由于温度对油粘度的影响,热溶剂比单独的溶剂更有效。发现溶剂的效果远小于热量,加热溶剂的高回收率与热量直接相关。与高溶剂速率高相比,冷却溶剂减少沥青粘度的冷却粘度需要的时间更长。与热贡献导致的导电热加热相比,热溶剂显示出的承诺。尽管使用溶剂的益处,但必须考虑经济学。本研究提高了我们对孔隙率辅助恢复过程和建模方法的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号