首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Applied Energy >Comparison study of Trilateral Rankine Cycle, Organic Flash Cycle and basic Organic Rankine Cycle for low grade heat recovery
【24h】

Comparison study of Trilateral Rankine Cycle, Organic Flash Cycle and basic Organic Rankine Cycle for low grade heat recovery

机译:低等级热回收三边朗肯循环,有机闪脉循环,有机闪脉循环和基本有机朗肯循环的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) has been widely used for the recovery of low-grade heat into power such as solar energy and industrial waste heat. The overall thermal efficiency of ORC is affected by large exergy destruction in the evaporator due to the temperature mismatching between the heat source and working fluid. Trilateral Cycle (TLC) and Organic Flash Cycle (OFC) have been recognized as potential solutions because of their better performance on temperature matching between the heat source and working fluid at the evaporator. In this study, thermodynamic models of above three cycles are established in MATLAB/REFPROP. Results indicate that TLC obtains the largest net power output, thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency of 13.6 kW, 14.8% and 40.8% respectively at the evaporation temperature of 152°C, which is 37% higher than that of BORC (9.9 kW) and 58% higher than that of OFC (8.6 kW). BORC is more suitable under the conditions low evaporation temperature is relatively low due to the achieved maximum net power output, thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency. OFC has the minimum net power output, thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency under all the conditions of evaporation temperature compared to TLC and BORC. As for the UA value, TLC has the largest one ranging from 7.9 kW/°C to 8.8 kW/°C under all conditions while OFC gains the minimum UA value at low evaporation temperature and BORC gains the minimum UA value at high evaporation temperature.
机译:有机朗肯循环(ORC)已被广泛用于将低级热量恢复到诸如太阳能和工业废物中的功率。由于热源和工作流体之间的温度不匹配,蒸发器的总体热效率受到蒸发器中大的漏极破坏的影响。三边周期(TLC)和有机闪存周期(OFC)被认为是潜在的解决方案,因为它们在蒸发器处的热源和工作流体之间的温度匹配上的性能更好。在本研究中,在Matlab / Refprop中建立了高于三个循环的热力学模型。结果表明,TLC分别在152°C的蒸发温度下分别获得13.6千瓦的最大净功率输出,热效率和低渗效率为13.6千瓦,14.8%和40.8%,比硼(9.9 kW)和58升高37% %高于OFC(8.6 kW)。由于达到最大净功率输出,热效率和高效率,硼管在低蒸发温度下更适合于蒸发温度相对较低。与TLC和BORC相比,OFC在所有蒸发温度条件下具有最小净功率输出,热效率和高效率。对于UA值,TLC在所有条件下,TLC在7.9kW /°C至8.8 kW /°C的同时,在低蒸发温度下降低最小UA值,硼管在高蒸发温度下获得最小UA值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号