【24h】

Validating a Tool to Measure Safety Culture

机译:验证衡量安全文化的工具

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A study was conducted to determine the validity of an instrument used to measure safety culture. This instrument was developed from a framework that was garnered from research literature and describes 18 characteristics of safety culture at different levels of culture maturity. Scores from the completed instrument identify the distribution and preponderance of culture maturity for a group. Over 800 completed surveys were gathered and analyzed to determine the validity of its measurements. As this measurement tool is available to safety practicitioners through research literature, validation of its measurement capability creates an avenue for many to evaluate their safety culture with confidence. Additionally, the study provides recommendations on how to use the tool effectively and improve the existing instrument. Analysis of the data using confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and Cronbach’s Alpha yielded confirmation that the existing instrument was indeed a reliable measure. Potential gaps were also identified. Both factor analyses supported a three factor structure of safety culture, with one factor that was less developed than the remaining two. As a result of these findings, while the current instrument can be useful in providing a valid indication of safety culture, modifications are recommended and detailed in the study. The importance of safety culture as a mechanism for improving HSE performance is well documented. However, current research does not agree on a model of safety culture nor does it support any particular instrument for measuring culture. The results of this study provide support of a three factor model that will be helpful for practitioners wanting to improve culture within their organization. As well, the validation of the current instrument provides a mechanism for measuring culture that is commonly available.
机译:进行了一项研究以确定用于测量安全培养的仪器的有效性。该仪器是从研究文献中获得的框架开发的,并描述了不同水平的文化成熟度的安全文化的18个特征。完成仪器的分数确定了一组文化成熟的分布和优势。收集和分析超过800种完成的调查以确定其测量的有效性。由于该测量工具通过研究文献提供安全实践者,因此对其测量能力的验证为许多人创造了大道,以便充满信心地评估其安全文化。此外,该研究还提供了有关如何有效使用该工具并改善现有仪器的建议。使用验证因子分析,探索因子分析和Cronbach的alpha的数据分析,即确认现有仪器确实是可靠的措施。还确定了潜在的差距。两种因素分析都支持安全培养的三个因素结构,具有比其余两种的一个因素较少。由于这些发现,虽然目前的仪器可用于提供安全培养的有效指示,但在研究中建议并详述的修改。安全文化作为改善HSE表现的机制的重要性得到了充分的记录。然而,目前的研究不恰同安全文化模型,也不达到它支持任何特定的测量文化仪器。本研究的结果提供了三个因素模型的支持,这些模型将有助于寻求在组织内改善文化的从业者。同样,目前仪器的验证提供了一种测量通常可用的培养的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号