首页> 外文会议>SPE Middle East Health, Safety, Environment Sustainable Development Conference >Impact of Emergency Shutdown Devices on Relief System Sizing and Design
【24h】

Impact of Emergency Shutdown Devices on Relief System Sizing and Design

机译:紧急停机装置对浮雕系统尺寸和设计的影响

获取原文

摘要

A relief system designer is primarily guided by the expected “relief load.” That is, the maximum flow rate expected through the relief system under credible failure scenarios. An overestimate of the relief load will lead to oversized equipment (wasted capital and higher operating costs) and an underestimate will result in an ineffective and unsafe system. In the aftermath of the March 2005 major incident at the BP Texas City refinery, on-plot relieving of hydrocarbons to atmosphere has come under intense criticism, and rightly so. It can be stipulated that the remedial measures being considered include routing of any existing on-plot atmospheric relieving devises to closed relief systems. This change, if brought about without due care, can lead to compromising the design capacity of the relief system, and to potential disaster. In the sizing of individual relief valves protecting equipment or process or system, it is a common practice not to take cognizance of any immediate operator action or the action of any mitigating devices. However, an increasing number of consultants and practitioners are recommending not to apply the same philosophy when it comes to designing an overall refinery flare system to cope with common mode failures (e.g., loss of power, cooling water supply failure, etc.). They propose taking credit for the action of devices such as unit emergency shutdown (ESD) systems, trips (for example, fired heater fuel supply cut-offs), or auto-starts of pumps whose actions reduce the potential load on the overall refinery flare system. Savings can thus be realized in the sizing of flare headers and other ancillary equipment. While there is no objection, in principle, to taking credit for ESDs in the design of relief systems, its application in practice deserves careful scrutiny. There are still many related issues that have not been adequately addressed by the proponents of the credit-taking approach. This paper highlights these concerns and offers practical advice to those facing relief system design decisions.
机译:救济系统设计师主要由预期的“浮雕负载”指导。也就是说,通过可信失败情景下通过释放系统预期的最大流速。高估浮雕负荷将导致超大设备(浪费资本和更高的运营成本),低估将导致无效和不安全的系统。在2005年3月的后果在BP德克萨斯城炼油厂的主要事件中,在富含碳氢化合物的情况下,富含碳氢化合物的侵略性受到了强烈的批评,而且正确的批评。可以规定所考虑的补救措施包括路由任何现有的绘图大气缓解设计为闭合浮雕系统。如果在没有适当的照顾的情况下,这种变化会导致泄露救济系统的设计能力,以及潜在灾难。在保护设备或流程或系统的单独浮雕阀的尺寸中,常见的做法是不认识到任何即时操作员行动或任何缓解设备的动作。然而,越来越多的顾问和从业者在设计整个炼油厂爆发系统以应对共同模式故障时(例如,电源损失,冷却供水失败等),建议不要申请同样的哲学。他们建议为单位紧急停机(ESD)系统等设备的行动提供信贷,例如触发的加热器燃料供应截止值),或者自动启动泵,其动作减少整体炼油厂的潜在负载系统。因此,可以在闪光头和其他辅助设备的尺寸中实现节省。虽然原则上没有反对的反对意见,但在救援系统设计中为ESDS信任,其在实践中的应用应该受到仔细审查。仍有许多相关问题,信用方法的支持者没有充分解决。本文突出了这些问题,并为面临救济系统设计决策提供了实用建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号