首页> 外文会议>IET and IAM Asset Management Conference >IS RELIABILITY CENTRED MAINTENANCE (RCM) MAKING A COMEBACK AND IF SO WILL IT PROVE TO BE A WORTHWHILE INVESTMENT?
【24h】

IS RELIABILITY CENTRED MAINTENANCE (RCM) MAKING A COMEBACK AND IF SO WILL IT PROVE TO BE A WORTHWHILE INVESTMENT?

机译:是可靠的中心维护(RCM)复出,如果是的话,它会被证明是一个有价值的投资吗?

获取原文

摘要

There are a number of financial and non-financial drivers for optimising asset reliability. These are linked, preferably overtly, to the business strategy, at the heart of which should have some form of reference to safety and environmental impact. There is often a tension between reducing asset cost of ownership and increasing asset reliability and, most importantly in hazardous environments, safety. Some organisations already employ a form of Reliability Centred Maintenance (RCM), or are managing and maintaining their assets in such a way that would not make an investment in RCM worthwhile. Where this is not the case, technical teams are often maintaining assets for what they are, rather than what they do. This means that regardless of business and safety criticality an asset gets the "manufacturer's recommended maintenance routine". Is RCM starting to make a comeback and if so will it prove to be a worthwhile investment? How can you increase reliability whilst reducing the cost of asset ownership? Reliability Centred Maintenance (RCM) is an approach that can help achieve this. It is, however, an investment in itself in terms of organisational learning and opportunity costs for those involved in the analysis and implementation. Prior to full scale implementation it is important to conduct a pilot project to assess the costs and benefits of full scale implementation. One benefit is the potential to reduce the working capital required, as the spare parts inventory is reduced through better understanding of the mean time to failure. Such data is often poorly represented in existing information systems. A tailored maintenance management system can be put in place to address failure modes, which will not only increase asset reliability, but should make a demonstrable improvement to understanding and managing risks to safety and the environment. This paper gives a brief history of RCM and its impact on Asset Management and looks at the costs and benefits of implementing RCM as part of an integrated asset management system.
机译:有许多金融和非金融驱动因素优化资产可靠性。这些与业务策略相连,优选地将其互联,其核心应具有某种形式的安全和环境影响。在减少资产所有权成本和增加资产可靠性之间,并且在危险环境中,最重要的是,在危险环境中的安全性之间存在紧张。有些组织已经采用了一种可靠性的维护(RCM)的形式,或者正在以这样的方式管理和维护其资产,这不会在RCM值得投资。如果不是这种情况,技术团队往往是为他们所做的而维持资产,而不是他们所做的。这意味着无论业务和安全关键点如何,资产都会获得“制造商推荐的维护程序”。 RCM开始卷土重来,如果是这样,它会被证明是一个有价值的投资吗?如何提高可靠性,同时降低资产所有权的成本?可靠性的维护(RCM)是一种可以帮助实现这一目标的方法。然而,在组织学习和有机会成本方面,它本身就是对分析和实施方面的机会的投资。在全面规模实施之前,进行试点项目,以评估全规模实施的成本和益处。一个好处是减少所需的营运资金的可能性,因为通过更好地理解平均故障的备件库存减少。这些数据通常在现有信息系统中差不多。可以放置定制的维护管理系统以解决故障模式,这不仅会增加资产可靠性,而且应该对理解和管理安全性和环境的风险来说明显改善。本文介绍了RCM的简要历史及其对资产管理的影响,并介绍了实施RCM作为综合资产管理系统的一部分的成本和益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号