首页> 外文会议>Annual Conference of the Australian^Society^of^Sugar^Cane^Technologists >VALIDATING WATER USE AND YIELD ESTIMATES DERIVED FROM REMOTE SENSING AND CROP MODELLING FOR IRRIGATED SUGARCANE IN MPUMALANGA, SOUTH AFRICA
【24h】

VALIDATING WATER USE AND YIELD ESTIMATES DERIVED FROM REMOTE SENSING AND CROP MODELLING FOR IRRIGATED SUGARCANE IN MPUMALANGA, SOUTH AFRICA

机译:在南非姆拉邦省灌溉甘蔗中验证水使用和产量估计,源于南非普鲁冈州的灌溉甘蔗

获取原文

摘要

Accurate and timeous information on crop growth and crop water use are crucial to support the management of irrigated sugarcane production. These can be estimated from weather-based simulation models (e.g. the Canesim sugarcane model) and with remotesensing technology (such as the Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land - SEBAL), but the accuracy of these estimates needs to be determined before operational application. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of Canesim and SEBAL estimates of crop growth and water use by comparing it to ground measurements taken in thirteen sugarcane fields in Mpumalanga, South Africa. The Canesim model was used to simulate daily evapotranspiration (ET), canopy cover (CC), dry aerial biomass (ADM) and dry stalk mass (SDM) for each field using appropriate soil, weather, irrigation and crop input data. The SEBAL method was used to estimate, from satellite imagery and weather data, weekly totals of ET and dry biomass production. Weekly values of CC was also derived from satellite imagery. An algorithm was developed to estimate ADM, SDM and cane yield from remotely sensed data and temperature. This information was produced for 52 consecutive weeks from 3 November 2011 to 31 October 2012. CC was also measured in each field with a line quantum sensor at monthly intervals and ADM and SDM were determined from samples taken on three to four occasions. Daily ET was estimated in one field using the surface renewal (SR) technique. CC estimated from satellite imagery was much more accurate than that estimated by Canesim. SEBAL and Canesim ET estimates were similar with both exceeding estimates from SR measurements by about 8 mm/week. SEBAL estimates of stalk dry mass and cane yields were similar to that of the Canesim model, when the latter used measured soil water content data as input. An advantage of using a remote sensing technique is that it can provide spatial estimates at 30 m resolution of all variables reported in this study, while crop model estimatesare point based and cannot account for within-field variation. SEBAL data could be used to identify sugarcane areas with water deficit, slow growth or low yield at field, farm and regional levels, enabling corrective action to be taking early. Remotelysensed CC and SEBAL estimates of ET and biomass production could also enhance the accuracy of yield forecasts from models, at mill and field levels.
机译:关于作物生长和作物用水的准确性和不断的信息对于支持灌溉甘蔗生产的管理至关重要。这些可以从基于天气的仿真模型(例如Canesim Sugarcane模型)和Remotesensing技术(例如用于陆片的表面能量平衡算法),但是在操作应用之前需要确定这些估计的准确性。本研究的目的是评估Canesim和Sebal估计的作物生长和用水估计的准确性,通过将其与南非普马兰加的十三甘油田造成的地面测量进行比较。 Canesim模型用于使用适当的土壤,天气,灌溉和作物输入数据模拟每日蒸散(ET),冠层覆盖(CC),干燥空穴覆盖(CC),干燥空气生物量(ADM)和干茎质量(SDM)。 SEBAL方法用于估计卫星图像和天气数据,每周总量的ET和干生物质生产。 CC的每周价值也来自卫星图像。开发了一种算法,以估算远程感测数据和温度的ADM,SDM和甘蔗产量。这些信息在2011年11月3日至10月31日之前连续52周制作.CC也在每个领域中测量,每月线量子传感器,ADM和SDM从三到四次采集的样品中确定。每日ET使用表面更新(SR)技术在一个场中估计。从卫星图像估计的CC比Canesim估计更准确。 Sebal和Canesim ET估计与SR测量的超过估计值相似约8毫米/周。当后者使用的土壤水分含量数据作为输入时,茎干干肿块和甘蔗产量的SEBAL估计与Canesim模型的估计相似。使用遥感技术的优点是它可以在本研究中报告的所有变量的分辨率为30米的分辨率提供空间估计,而作物模型基于估计点,不能考虑在现场变化。塞培数据可用于鉴定甘蔗区域,在野外,农场和区域水平处具有水赤字,增长缓慢或低产,使纠正措施正在提前服用。 ET和生物质生产的偏心CC和SEBAL估计也可以提高模型,磨机和场平均水平的收益率预测的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号