首页> 外文会议>SPE Western North American and Rocky Mountain Joint Meeting >Evaluation of Four Thermal Recovery Methods for Bitumen Extraction
【24h】

Evaluation of Four Thermal Recovery Methods for Bitumen Extraction

机译:沥青提取四种热回收方法的评价

获取原文

摘要

Around 70%of the world’s bitumen resources are deposited in Western Alberta.Surface mining is applicable only to 20%of the total reserves,and in-situ cold production can only be effective to recover the 5%of the initial bitumen in place.This low extraction yield mainly stems from the high viscosities of bitumen,which can be reduced dramatically with the application of thermal recovery.However,economically viable and technically feasible bitumen extraction with thermal methods is challenging.There are also a range of adverse environmental issues associated with thermal methods.As conventional resources decline and since conventional recovery methods are insufficient to extract unconventional reserves effectively,it is necessary to address these issues associated with thermal recovery methods. In this study,we evaluated the recovery characteristics of a Canadian bitumen(8.8°API-53,000 cp,at 21°C)with four thermal recovery methods.A two-dimensional physical model was used to evaluate the performances of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage(SAGD)and Hot Water Injection(HWI)with SAGD well configuration.Steam Flooding(SF)and In-Situ Combustion(ISC)experiments were performed with two separate one-dimensional experimental set-ups. Experimental conditions were maintained identical at reservoir average conditions.The effluent gas composition,temperature profiles,oil recovery,behavior of fluid(oil,water,steam,and gas)front movements,and the level of oil upgrading were discussed by considering the environmental and economic constrains of the processes.Furthermore,core samples were extracted from the model to evaluate and visualize the sweep efficiency.Experimental findings reveal that ISC yielded the highest(~90 wt%)and HWI the lowest(~33 wt%)oil recoveries.In terms of environmental footprints,SF produced the highest amount of gases per barrel oil production,and HWI resulted in the lowest gas production.Among HWI,SAGD,and SF,energy consumption was the greatest in SAGD and the worst sweep efficiency was obtained with SF.Our results recommend a hybrid utilization of thermal recovery methods,specifically HWI with ISC for the extraction of this bitumen. HWI prepares the reservoir for ISC by aiding to increase reservoir temperature and reducing the reservoir heterogeneities with hot water distribution.
机译:世界上大约70%的沥青资源存放在艾伯塔省西部。树立挖掘仅适用于总储备的20%,原位冷轧只能有效地收回最初的沥青的5%。这低提取产率主要源于沥青的高粘度,这可以随着热回收的应用而显着减少。然而,使用热方法的经济上可行和技术上可行的沥青提取是挑战性的。也是与之相关的不利环境问题范围热方法。传统资源下降,因为传统的恢复方法不足以有效地提取非传统储备,有必要解决与热回收方法相关的这些问题。在本研究中,我们评估了加拿大沥青(8.8°API-53,000 CP,21°C)的恢复特性,具有四种热回收方法。使用二维物理模型来评估蒸汽辅助重力排水的性能(SAGD)和热注水(HWI)具有SAGD井配置。用两种单独的一维实验组进行漏斗洪水(SF)和原位燃烧(ISC)实验。在储层平均条件下实验条件保持相同。通过考虑环境和环境来讨论流出的气体组合物,温度谱,液体(油,水,蒸汽和气体)前部运动和升级水平。流程的经济约束。从模型中提取核样品,从模型中提取,评价和可视化扫描效率。实验结果表明,ISC产生最高(〜90重量%)和HWI最低(〜33wt%)的油回收率。在环境足迹方面,SF生产了每桶油生产量最高的气体,HWI导致了最低的天然气生产。山东HWI,SAGD和SF,能源消耗是索峰最大的,并且获得最糟糕的扫描效率SF.OUR结果建议使用热回收方法的混合使用,特别是HWI,用于提取该沥青。 HWI通过帮助增加储层温度并减少热水分布的水库异质性,为ISC做好储层。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号