首页> 外文会议>International Conference of Emerging Applications of Information Technology >Analysis of a Network of AQM Router Supporting TCP Flows and Comparison with XCP
【24h】

Analysis of a Network of AQM Router Supporting TCP Flows and Comparison with XCP

机译:支持TCP流量的AQM路由器网络和XCP比较分析

获取原文

摘要

The most important issues in the Internet are congestion control. Queue management is an important part to provide better link utilization and fair service of buffer at the Internet router so as to control the congestion. To provide this we can implement different queuing techniques at the Internet router where TCP is used as transport protocol or we can use eXplicit control protocol (XCP). Our aim is to analyze both TCP and XCP. So this paper explores the impact of queuing mechanism on the performance of TCP with respect to different number of connection, bandwidth and RTT and makes comparison with XCP in single bottleneck dumbbell topology. Among many TCP variants, we considered Reno as TCP variants protocol over queuing mechanism like random early detection (RED), nonlinear random early detection (NLRED), random exponential marking (REM). Through the extensive simulation, we found that the performance of XCP is better than TCP+RED, TCP+NLRD, TCP+ REM. Among queuing mechanism, the performance of TCP over NLRED is better than RED and REM.
机译:互联网中最重要的问题是拥塞控制。队列管理是在Internet路由器提供更好的链接利用率和公平服务的重要组成部分,以便控制拥塞。为了提供这一点,我们可以在Internet路由器处实现不同的排队技巧,其中TCP用作传输协议,或者我们可以使用显式控制协议(XCP)。我们的目标是分析TCP和XCP。因此,本文探讨了排队机制对不同数量的连接,带宽和RTT的TCP性能的影响,并与单个瓶颈哑铃拓扑中的XCP进行比较。在许多TCP变体中,我们认为Reno作为TCP变体协议通过随机早期检测(红色),非线性随机早期检测(NLRED),随机指数标记(REM)。通过广泛的模拟,我们发现XCP的性能优于TCP + RED,TCP + NLRD,TCP + REM。在排队机制中,TCP对NLRED的性能优于红色和REM。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号