首页> 外文会议>World Congress on Resilience. >Conceptualizing resilience: dissociation, avoidance, and silence as resilient trajectories among former child soldiers and ex-combatants coping with past trauma and present challenges in acholiland, Northern Uganda.
【24h】

Conceptualizing resilience: dissociation, avoidance, and silence as resilient trajectories among former child soldiers and ex-combatants coping with past trauma and present challenges in acholiland, Northern Uganda.

机译:概念化恢复力:前儿童士兵和前战斗人员的解离,避免和沉默作为与过去创伤的前战斗人员,并在乌干达北部的acholiland中提出挑战。

获取原文

摘要

Studies of resilience in war-torn countries such as Uganda, Congo and Mozambique have broadened the field of resilience research [1, 2, 3, 4]. However "significant gaps in our knowledge about effective responses and factors associated with resilient outcomes and resilient trajectories" in these contexts prevail [5].In 2013 ethnographic fieldwork was carried out among former child soldiers and ex-combatants from the rebel army The Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) in Northern Uganda, Acholiland to explore coping strategies, demobilization and resilience in a context of severe adversity. The LRA is known for methods of brutal torture and use of child soldiers in their war against the Ugandan government using similar means. This paper rests on in-depth descriptions and emic notions of individual ex-combatant's responses to such adversity. The responses associated with resilient trajectories and outcomes call for re-conceptualizations of resilience: In Acholiland 'dissociation', 'avoidance', and 'silence' and in some cases 'appetitive aggression' [6] seem key in resilient responses and coping. Thus resilience must be studied in a variety of contexts, based on what we know from resilience research [7, 8] but integrated with a culturally sensitive and individual differences perspective approach [9]. Not doing so puts the subjects we study at risk of being placed in confining categories of pathology, which in return puts scholars at risk of missing the opportunity to broaden and deepen our understanding of resilience.
机译:乌干达,刚果和莫桑比克等战争蹂躏的国家的复原力研究扩大了弹性研究领域[1,2,3,4]。然而,在这些背景下,我们对有关有效应对和因素的知识的显着差距,以这些背景为准,普遍[5]。在叛逆军的前儿童士兵和前战斗人员中,在叛逆军队的抵抗中进行了民族士兵和前战斗人员陆军(LRA)在乌干达北部,Acholliland,在严重逆境的背景下探索应对策略,复员和弹性。众所周知,LRA闻名于使用类似手段的乌干达政府对乌干达政府的战争中的残酷酷刑和使用儿童士兵的方法。本文依赖于个人前战斗人员对这些逆境的深入描述和巨大概念。与弹性轨迹和结果相关的响应来呼吁重新概念化恢复力:在acholliland'解离',“避免”和“沉默”中,在某些情况下,在某些情况下,同样的弹性反应和应对的关键。因此,必须基于从恢复力研究[7,8]所知,但与文化敏感和个体差异的观点相结合[9],必须在各种情况下在各种情况下进行恢复力。没有这样做,我们将受试者投入受到被置于限制病理类别的风险的主题,这在回报中将学者们冒着遗失的风险敞大机会,加深我们对恢复力的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号