首页> 外文会议>AMA Winter Marketing Educators Conference >COMPARING DATA COLLECTION ALTERNATIVES: AMAZON MTURK, COLLEGE STUDENTS, AND SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS
【24h】

COMPARING DATA COLLECTION ALTERNATIVES: AMAZON MTURK, COLLEGE STUDENTS, AND SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS

机译:比较数据收集替代品:亚马逊MTurk,大学生和次要数据分析

获取原文

摘要

Previous research has tested differences among Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk), college students, and other online research (Buhrmester et al. 2011; Paolacci et al. 2010) but has not addressed the comparison between mTurk, college students, and secondary data sources. Much research involves secondary data (Church 2002), and therefore a comparison of these three common methods of data collection is a beneficial addition to the marketing literature. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to cpmpare the effectiveness of these data collection methods (i.e., panel sample through secondary data research, college students through primary data research, and adult sample through primary data research collected by using mTurk) in terms of demographic variables distribution, psychometric properties, and testing relationships among variables. The results of this comparison will reveal the strengths and weaknesses of three common data collection methods and benefit researchers when they face a choice between these data collection methods.
机译:以前的研究在亚马逊机械土耳其(MTURK),大学生和其他在线研究中测试了差异(Buhrmester等,2011; Paolacci等,2010)但没有解决Mturk,大学生和二级数据来源的比较。许多研究涉及次要数据(教会2002),因此比较这三种常见的数据收集方法是营销文学的有益补充。因此,本文的目的是CPMPARE通过使用MTURK收集的主要数据研究,通过使用MTURK收集的次级数据研究,通过使用MTURK收集的次级数据研究,通过使用MTURK收集的次级数据研究,大学生通过次级数据研究,通过使用MTURK收集的次级数据研究,以及通过使用MTURK收集的次级数据研究的有效性变量分布,心理测量和变量之间的测试关系。这种比较的结果将揭示三种常见数据收集方法的优势和弱点,并在这些数据收集方法之间采取选择时受益研究人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号