首页> 外文会议>ION Pacific PNT Meeting >Discrepancies Between Provided DCB Estimates and Equivalent Formulations in CAS DCB Product
【24h】

Discrepancies Between Provided DCB Estimates and Equivalent Formulations in CAS DCB Product

机译:在CAS DCB产品中提供的DCB估计和等效配方之间的差异

获取原文

摘要

In order to obtain meaningful absolute Total Electron Content (TEC) estimates using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) measurements it is essential to correct the Differential Code Bias (DCB) induced by the satellite and receiver hardware. Estimates of the satellite DCBs may be obtained from products provided by a number of agencies, including the multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS). MGEX provides two different DCB products, one produced by the Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (IGG) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and the other produced by the German Space Operations Center (DLR). Both of these products provide DCBs between a few defined pairs of signals. In some cases the provided pairs must be combined to form the DCB in which the user is interested. For example, the DCB between Global Positioning System (GPS) L1C/A and the L2C pilot channel must be obtained using the following combination of DCB estimates C1C-C2W + C2W-C2L from either the CAS or DLR product. However, using the CAS product the same DCB can also be obtained using the combination C1C-C1W + C1W-C2W + C2W-C2L. There are also multiple ways to obtain the bias between GPS L1C/A and L2P(Y) (Z-tracking) and GLObal NAvigation Satellite System (GLONASS) L1C/A and L2C/A using the CAS product. Regardless of the combination used the final DCB should be the same as it is between the same two signals, however, this is not always the case. For a few satellites both methods produce the same results, but for others the difference can exceed one nanosecond, which translates to more than 2TECu when estimating TEC. This paper illustrates these differences between CAS DCB combinations over a year (October 1, 2017 to October 1, 2018).
机译:为了使用全局导航卫星系统(GNSS)测量来获得有意义的绝对电子含量(TEC)估计,可以校正由卫星和接收器硬件引起的差分码偏差(DCB)。卫星DCB的估计可以从多个机构提供的产品提供,包括国际GNSS服务(IGS)的多GNSS实验(MGEX)。 MGEX提供了两种不同的DCB产品,由中国科学院的大地影仪和地球物理学研究所(CAS)和其他由德国太空运营中心(DLR)制作的不同的DCB产品。这两种产品都在少数定义的信号对之间提供DCB。在某些情况下,必须组合提供的对以形成用户感兴趣的DCB。例如,必须使用以下DCB估计来自CAS或DLR产品的DCB估计C1C-C2W + C2W-C2L的组合来获得全球定位系统(GPS)L1C / A和L2C导频信道之间的DCB。然而,使用CAS产物,也可以使用组合C1C-C1W + C1W-C2W + C2W-C2L获得相同的DCB。还有多种方法可以在GPS L1C / A和L2P(Y)(Z跟踪)和全局导航卫星系统(Glonass)L1C / A和L2C / A使用CAS产品之间获得偏置。无论使用使用最终DCB的组合如何与相同的两个信号之间相同,但情况并非总是如此。对于少数卫星,两种方法产生相同的结果,但对于其他方法,差异可能超过一个纳秒,这在估计TEC时转化为2秒以上。本文说明了CAS DCB组合多年(2017年10月1日至2018年10月1日)之间的这些差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号