首页> 外文会议>Society for Mining, Metallurgy Exploration Annual Meeting and Exhibit >MEMBRANE VS. CHEMICAL TREATMENT TO REMOVE MINE WATER CONTAMINANTS - DETERMINING WHICH PROCESS WORKS BEST FOR MINE WATER TREATMENT NEEDS
【24h】

MEMBRANE VS. CHEMICAL TREATMENT TO REMOVE MINE WATER CONTAMINANTS - DETERMINING WHICH PROCESS WORKS BEST FOR MINE WATER TREATMENT NEEDS

机译:膜与化学处理去除矿井水污染物 ​​- 确定最适合矿井水处理需求的过程

获取原文

摘要

Reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) are widely regarded as being best available technologies (BATs) for removing contaminants of concern from water. In recent years, NF or RO treatment has increasingly gained more acceptance in the mining industry for treating mine water to remove a wide assortment of contaminants, either for meeting discharge standards or for internal reuse in mining processes. Consequently, the number of NF or RO membrane mine water treatment facilities has steadily increased. Although NF or RO membrane filtration can be a powerful tool in mine water treatment, especially when multiple contaminant removal is required, it also has many potential disadvantages.Besides the generally higher capital and operational costs for the high pressure membrane processes, organic constituents in mine water may foul the membranes, while inorganic compounds such as gypsum, calcite, or silica are liable to scale the expensive membranes if proper pre-treatment processes are not implemented. Additionally, because these membrane treatment processes generate a substantial reject or brine waste stream in addition to the clean treated water or permeate stream, brine management also needs to be considered carefully when deciding upon the viability of an NF or RO mine water treatment process. Because of these issues, it is important to conduct detailed analyses of the trade-off between selecting NF or RO vs. using chemical treatment processes when designing a mine water treatment facility.Analyses that are necessary to decide which treatment processes will work best for mine water treatment needs given different sets of circumstances, discharge standards, and water chemistry parameters will be discussed. And two case studies, one in which it was determined that membrane filtration would be best for the mine's water treatment needs, and another in which it was determined that chemical treatment would be best, will be featured.
机译:反渗透(RO)和纳米滤膜(NF)被广泛认为是最佳可用技术(蝙蝠),用于去除水的污染物。近年来,NF或RO治疗越来越多地在采矿业验收,用于治疗矿井水以消除各种各样的污染物,用于满足排放标准或用于采矿过程中的内部重用。因此,NF或RO膜矿水处理设施的数量稳步增加。虽然NF或RO膜过滤可以是矿井水处理中的强大工具,但特别是当需要多种污染物的去除时,它也具有许多潜在的缺点。存在普遍较高的高压膜方法,矿井有机成分的普遍较高的资金和运营成本水可能污染膜,而无机化合物如石膏,方解石或二氧化硅,如果没有实施适当的预处理过程,则易于缩放昂贵的膜。另外,由于这些膜处理过程除了清洁处理的水或渗透物流之外,由于清洁处理的水或渗透物流之外,还需要在决定NF或RO矿水处理过程的可行性时仔细考虑盐水管理。由于这些问题,在设计矿井水处理设施时使用化学处理工艺,在选择NF或RO之间进行详细分析。在设计矿井水处理设施时,使用化学处理过程。确定哪种治疗过程将最适合矿井所必需的水处理需要鉴于不同的情况,排放标准和水化学参数。和两种案例研究,其中确定膜过滤最适合矿山的水处理需求,另一个在其确定最佳化学处理的情况下,将是最佳的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号