首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Technology of Architecture and Structure >A Comparison on the Productivity of Lightweight Concrete Wall Method And RC Bearing Wall Method
【24h】

A Comparison on the Productivity of Lightweight Concrete Wall Method And RC Bearing Wall Method

机译:轻质混凝土墙体方法和RC轴承壁法生产率的比较

获取原文

摘要

It was the much more variation through the development of technology of housing construction and the change of life cycle of occupation and it is the same to construct the apartment. In early age to adopt the apartment, the rahmen method was main course but the RC bearing wall method is the main course nowhere. However, the RC bearing wall method was the course to increase a wet method and to increase a wet method was a longer a construction duration & input an abundant labor and it is the actual condition to drop a qualification for increasing the unit cost of construction & oncoming age of a skilled worker & a skill falling. So, it is going to be higher the demanding of dry wall method to be changeable throughout being the higher of social demanding on the long-life housing of demanding recently. Therefore, in this study, it would compare & analyze the productivity of lightweight concrete dry wall method (LDWM) and the RC bearing wall method (BWM).
机译:通过外壳建设技术和职业生命周期的变化,这是越来越多的变化,并且建造公寓是相同的。在采用公寓的早期,Rahmen方法是主要的课程,但RC轴承墙法是主要的课程。然而,RC轴承壁法是增加湿法方法的过程,增加湿法方法是延长施工持续时间和投入富裕的劳动力,因此降低了增加施工单位成本的资格的实际条件。刚才熟练的工人和技能落下的年龄。因此,在最近苛刻的苛刻长寿住房的社会苛刻的社会苛刻的社会苛刻的情况下,干燥墙体方法的要求越大。因此,在本研究中,它将比较和分析轻质混凝土干墙法(LDWM)和RC轴承壁法(BWM)的生产率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号