首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Green Manufacturing (MEGM 2012) >Comparison of Residual Stress Between MIG Welding and Friction Stir Welding
【24h】

Comparison of Residual Stress Between MIG Welding and Friction Stir Welding

机译:MIG焊接与摩擦搅拌焊接的残余应力比较

获取原文

摘要

Residual stress distribution plays a very important role in welded structures, the aim of present work is to find out the effect of different welding methods on the residual stress distribution by means of neutron diffraction measurements and FE models simulation. 4 mm thick DH-36 steel plates were butt welded by MIG welding process and 5 mm thick AA 2024 aluminium alloy plates were butt welded by friction stir welding process. Results show that residual stresses of MIG welding process are higher than those of friction stir welding process. The peak residual stress of MIG weld is close to the room temperature uniaxial yield strength of DH-36 while the peak residual stress of friction stir weld is just about 50% of the room temperature uniaxial yield strength of AA2024. The size effect of MIG welded and effect of welding speeds of friction stir welded on the residual stress distribution have also been studied in the paper.
机译:残余应力分布在焊接结构中起着非常重要的作用,目前工作的目的是通过中子衍射测量和Fe模型模拟来了解不同焊接方法对残余应力分布的影响。 4毫米厚的DH-36钢板由MIG焊接工艺焊接,5毫米厚的AA 2024铝合金板通过摩擦搅拌焊接工艺焊接。结果表明,MIG焊接过程的残余应力高于摩擦搅拌焊接工艺。 MIG焊缝的峰值残余应力靠近DH-36的室温单轴屈服强度,而摩擦搅拌焊缝的峰值残余应力仅为AA2024室温单轴屈服强度的约50%。纸张还研究了MIG焊接和摩擦搅拌焊接摩擦速度的焊接速度的施加速度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号