首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Building Materials >The Comparison between Ecological Engineering Method and Conventional Engineering Method for the Mountain Area Roadway Design
【24h】

The Comparison between Ecological Engineering Method and Conventional Engineering Method for the Mountain Area Roadway Design

机译:生态工程方法与山区巷道设计传统工程方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

This study shows that the traditional engineering method of mountain road construction has not only caused local ecological disturbance directly, but also through each of the stages of the preparation, such as material gathering, construction, continual maintenance, and the diminishing of recycling potential, whereas ecological engineering method, with safety as its main priority, could offer a better ecological condition for construction projects. Through studying the local environmental features and using the proper construction method, the most suitable, corresponding engineering method ought to be adopted. This research uses Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with surveys completed by field experts. This research contains three dimensions: Road Characteristics, Roadside Characteristics, Biological Characteristics. Additionally, actual samples of practical application of ecological engineering would also be discussed to further prove the result and the accuracy of the AHP. Research shows that in the overall planning of a mountain road construction project, ecological engineering method serves to be the better approach.
机译:这项研究表明,山区公路建设的传统设计方法不仅直接,而且通过各筹备的阶段,如材料收集,建设,不断维护和回收潜在的缺乏,造成当地生态的干扰,而生态工程方法,安全为主要优先权,可以为建筑项目提供更好的生态条件。通过研究本地环境特征,采用适当的施工方法,最合适的相应工程方法应该采用。本研究使用分析层次处理(AHP)进行现场专家完成的调查。本研究包含三个维度:道路特征,路边特征,生物特性。此外,还将讨论实际应用的实际应用样本,以进一步证明AHP的结果和准确性。研究表明,在山路建设项目的总体规划中,生态工程方法是更好的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号