首页> 外文会议>INMR World Congress >CONSIDERATIONS IN ARRESTER CONDITION MONITORING (with focus on 3rd harmonic analysis of current) - (PPT)
【24h】

CONSIDERATIONS IN ARRESTER CONDITION MONITORING (with focus on 3rd harmonic analysis of current) - (PPT)

机译:避雷器状态监测的考虑因素(重点关注第三次谐波分析) - (PPT)

获取原文

摘要

Metal oxide surge arresters (MOSAs) typically have very high reliability and can continue to function as intended almost indefinitely if they have been well designed, properly manufactured, and operated within their specified range of applied voltage, temporary overvoltage, surge magnitude and surge energy, and have not been physically damaged by some external force. However, history informs us that arresters do occasionally fail in service, implying that one or more of the aforementioned factors has been violated. By "fail", we usually mean that the arrester has suffered an internal short circuit, placing a fault (most often a line-to-ground fault) on the system. Almost invariably, this fault results in an operation of a circuit interrupting device (circuit breaker, recloser, fuse, etc.), causing disruption of electrical service. If the arrester is equipped with a disconnector (as is the case for most distribution arresters installed in the United States), the disconnector should operate when the fault current flows following an arrester short circuit, isolating the arrester either from the ground or from the line (depending on where the disconnector is installed); then, upon re-energization, the failed arrester is no longer in the circuit electrically and service can be continued (albeit with some reduced level of surge protection). In the case of a station arrester, a failure will typically cause a system lockout until either that portion of the substation can be by-passed, or until the arrester is physically removed from service. While it is desirable to avoid arrester failures at all times, the consequence of a station arrester failure is typically much more severe than that of a distribution arrester. Often, a considerably greater disruption of service would accompany a station arrester failure, and the cost of replacing a station arrester is typically orders of magnitude greater than that of replacing a distribution arrester.
机译:金属氧化物浪涌避雷器(MOSAS)通常具有非常高的可靠性,并且如果它们在其特定的施加电压范围内的施加电压,临时过电压,浪涌幅度和浪涌能量范围内操作,则可以继续使用几乎无限期地运行。并且没有受到一些外力的物理损坏。然而,历史向我们通知我们逮捕者偶尔会在服务中失败,这意味着一个或多个上述因素被侵犯。通过“失败”,我们通常意味着避雷器遭受了内部短路,在系统上放置了故障(最常是一个线路故障)。几乎总是,该故障导致电路中断设备(断路器,重闭合器,保险丝等)的操作,从而导致电气服务的破坏。如果避雷器配有隔离开关(如美国大多数分销避雷器的情况如上安装),则断路器应在避雷器短路后流动时流动,从地面或从线路隔离避雷器(取决于安装了断开连接器的位置);然后,在重新激励时,失效的避雷器在电路中不再在电路中,并且可以继续使用(尽管浪涌保护水平降低)。在车站避雷器的情况下,故障通常会导致系统锁定直到可以通过或直到避雷器从服务中除去的部分。虽然期望始终避免避免避税故障,但是避雷器故障的结果通常比分配避雷器的后果更严重。通常,相当大的服务中断将伴随站避雷器的失效,更换站避雷器的成本通常比更换分配避雷器更大的数量级。

著录项

  • 来源
    《INMR World Congress》|2014年||共38页
  • 会议地点
  • 作者

    Mike Comber;

  • 作者单位
  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 TM216-53;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号