首页> 外文会议>Society of Petroleum Engineers Enhaneed Oil Recovery Conference >An Alternate Simplified Approach For Selecting Enhanced Oil Recovery Technologies Using Analogs And Hubbert Peak Theory
【24h】

An Alternate Simplified Approach For Selecting Enhanced Oil Recovery Technologies Using Analogs And Hubbert Peak Theory

机译:一种使用模拟和喧哗的峰值理论选择增强型油回收技术的替代简化方法

获取原文

摘要

Selecting the optimum combination of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technologies is a critical activity during preparation of a successful business plan. This is usually accomplished by using protocols with technical parameters at reservoir formation levels from which candidates EOR technologies are screened and then subject to investment and risk assessment evaluation for final decision by management. The previous approach very often misses the effect of operational expenditures, wearing and failure related downtime and learning curve during pilot testing on oil recovery efficiency and EOR economics which is usually expressed in terms of net present value. This paper proposes an alternate simplified approach using an acceptable representation of life cycle phases of natural and physical asset components functioning as a system of assets for a particular subject reservoir. We introduce a taxonomic solution to help in classifying candidates EOR technologies. Four major functional indices are used for handling uncertainties and risks using data from analogs for defined scenarios in the subject reservoir: 1-Accesability) Footprint effects for constructing and operating physical assets (wells and surface infrastructure), 2- Contactability) Volume of resources contacted from a surface location, 3-Produceability) Volume of producible resources from drainage area to surface and 4- Effectiveness) Combined effect of availability, reliability, maintainability y and capability in efficiency of oil recovery. The four major indices are cross referenced with life cycle cost (LCC) and estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) using Hubbert peak oil theory and the Petroleum Resources Management System classification for resources and reserves. Uncertainties and risks are modeled with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) or Systems Dynamics (SD) depending on the complexity of the system of assets. We present examples using synthetic data to illustrate the method. This approach is worth using during EOR project definition and planning as an alternate to complex data hungry methods.
机译:选择增强的储油(EOR)技术的最佳组合是在编制成功的商业计划期间的关键活动。这通常是通过使用储存器形成级别的储层形成级别的技术参数的协议来实现,然后筛查候选EOR技术,然后通过管理的最终决定进行投资和风险评估评估。前面的方法经常误导运营支出,佩戴和故障相关的停机时间和学习曲线在采油检测中的效果和学习曲线,通常以净目前的价值表示。本文提出了一种使用作为特定主题储层的资产系统的自然和物理资产组件的生命周期阶段的可接受的生命周期阶段的可接受的简化方法。我们介绍一个分类解决方案,以帮助分类候选人EOR技术。四个主要功能指数用于处理使用来自主题储存器中的定义方案的模拟的数据的不确定性和风险:1可等离性)构建和操作物理资产(井和表面基础设施),2-可接受性的资源量的足迹效应从表面定位,3-生产力)从排水区到表面和4-效率的生产力资源的体积综合效果,可靠性,可维护性Y和能力的效率。四个主要指数以生命周期成本(LCC)的交叉引用,估计使用Hubbert峰值油理论和石油资源管理系统进行资源和储备的终极回收(EUR)。根据资产系统的复杂性,不确定性和风险模拟蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)或系统动态(SD)。我们使用合成数据提出示例以说明该方法。这种方法在EOR项目定义和规划期间是值得的,作为复杂数据饥饿的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号