首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Civil Engineering and Transportation >A Comparison of Two Magnitude Estimation Methods using Predominant Period in Earthquake Early Warning
【24h】

A Comparison of Two Magnitude Estimation Methods using Predominant Period in Earthquake Early Warning

机译:地震预警中主要估计方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Currently, there are two magnitude estimation approaches using predominant period for earthquake early warning, τpmaxmethod and τ_c method. We compared τpmax method with τ_c method from the NSMP strong motion records of 22 earthquakes in United States with moment magnitude ranging from 4.1 to 7.9, to explore which method was with higher precision and could be suitable for the earthquake early warning system. Our results show that scaling relations between the two predominant period parameters, τpmax and τ_c, calculated from P-wave arrivals and earthquake magnitude are consistent with previous research. It was found that τ_c cmethod had higher precision than τpmax method with the same filter band, and had best result in magnitude estimation resulting in a correlation coefficient of 0.78 and a standard deviation of 0.16 using 3 seconds signal after the P-wave arrival. We also found that τ_c cmethod without low-pass filter had higher accuracy than τpmax method without low-pass filter. We recommended τ_c cmethod using 3 seconds signal after the P-wave arrival as the priority magnitude estimation method for earthquake early warning.
机译:目前,使用抗震性预警,τpmaxmethod和τc方法的主要估计方法是两个幅度估计方法。我们将τpmax方法与来自美国22次地震的NSMP强运动记录的τpmax方法进行了比较了4.1至7.9的片刻幅度,探索哪种方法具有更高的精度,并且适用于地震预警系统。我们的研究结果表明,由P波到达和地震幅度计算的两个主要时间参数,τpmax和τ_c之间的缩放关系与先前的研究一致。发现τCCMETHOD具有比具有相同滤波器的τpmax方法更高的精度,并且最佳导致幅度估计结果为0.78的相关系数,并且在p波到达后使用3秒信号的标准偏差。我们还发现,如果没有低通滤波器的情况下,τ_c在没有低通滤波器的情况下具有比τpmax方法更高的精度,而没有低通滤波器。我们推荐使用3秒信号在P波到达后使用3秒信号作为地震预警的优先幅度估计方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号