首页> 外文会议>International Conference of Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics >Comparative Study on Direct Burning of Oil Shale and Coal
【24h】

Comparative Study on Direct Burning of Oil Shale and Coal

机译:油页岩和煤直接燃烧的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

A comparative study of the direct burning processes of oil shale and coal in a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) was done in this study using ANSYS Fluent software to solve numerically the governing equations of continuity, momentum, energy and mass diffusion using finite volume method. The model was built based on an existing experimental combustion burner unit. The model was validated by comparing the theoretical results of oil shale with proved experimental results from the combustion unit. It was found that the temperature contours of the combustion process showed that the adiabatic flame temperature was 1080 K for oil shale compared with 2260 K for coal, while the obtained experimental results of temperatures at various locations of burner during the direct burning of oil shale showed that the maximum temperature reached 962 K for oil shale. These results were used in economic and environmental analysis which show that oil shale may be used as alternative fuel for coal in cement industry in Jordan.
机译:在本研究中,使用ANSYS流畅的软件在本研究中进行了对循环流化床(CFB)中的直接燃烧过程的比较研究,使用有限体积法测定连续性,动量,能量和质量扩散的控制方程。该模型是基于现有的实验燃烧燃烧器单元构建。通过比较油页岩的理论结果与燃烧单元的实验结果进行比较,验证了该模型。发现燃烧过程的温度轮廓表明,与煤的2260K相比,燃烧过程的绝热火焰温度为1080k,而在油页岩直接燃烧期间获得的各种燃烧器的温度的温度的温度的实验结果表明最高温度达到油页岩962 k。这些结果用于经济和环境分析,表明石油页岩可作为约旦水泥工业中煤炭的替代燃料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号