首页> 外文会议>International Catfish Symposium >Catch of Channel Catfish with Tandem-Set Hoop Nets and Gill Nets in Lentic Systems of Nebraska
【24h】

Catch of Channel Catfish with Tandem-Set Hoop Nets and Gill Nets in Lentic Systems of Nebraska

机译:捕获峡湾鲶鱼与内布拉斯加州的熊熊队系统的串联箍网和鳃网

获取原文

摘要

Twenty-six Nebraska water bodies representing two ecosystem types (small standing waters and large standing waters) were surveyed during 2008 and 2009 with tandem-set hoop nets and experimental gill nets to determine if similar trends existed in catchrates and size structures of channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus captured with these gears. Gear efficiency was assessed as the number of sets (nets) that would be required to capture 100 channel catfish given observed catch per unit effort (CPUE). Efficiency of gill nets was not correlated with efficiency of hoop nets for capturing channel catfish. Small sample sizes prohibited estimation of proportional size distributions in most surveys; in the four surveys for which sample size was sufficient to quantify length-frequency distributions of captured channel catfish, distributions differed between gears. The CPUE of channel catfish did not differ between small and large water bodies for either gear. While catch rates of hoop nets were lower than ratesrecorded in previous studies, this gear was more efficient than gill nets at capturing channel catfish. However, comparisons of size structure between gears may be problematic.
机译:2008年和2009年,串联箍网和实验鳃网调查了二十六种生态系统类型(小型水域和大型站立水域)的水体,以确定是否存在于捕捞鲶鱼IATRURURUS的捕集物和尺寸结构中存在类似的趋势用这些齿轮捕获的punctatus。评估齿轮效率作为捕获每单位努力(CPUE)观察到的捕获量的100个通道鲶鱼所需的套装数(网)。 Gill网的效率与捕获通道鲶鱼的箍网的效率无关。在大多数调查中,小样本尺寸禁止估计比例尺寸分布;在样本大小足以定量捕获的通道鲶鱼的长频分布的四个调查中,齿轮之间的分布不同。通道鲶鱼的CPUE在任一齿轮的小型和大型水体之间没有区别。虽然在以前的研究中捕获箍网的速率低于速度,但该齿轮比捕获通道鲶鱼的鳃网更有效。然而,齿轮之间的尺寸结构的比较可能是有问题的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号