首页> 外文会议>ASME Joint Rail Conference >COMPARISON BETWEEN WAYSIDE STORAGE AND REVERSIBLE THYRISTOR CONTROLLED RECTIFIERS (RTCR) FOR HEAVY RAIL APPLICATIONS
【24h】

COMPARISON BETWEEN WAYSIDE STORAGE AND REVERSIBLE THYRISTOR CONTROLLED RECTIFIERS (RTCR) FOR HEAVY RAIL APPLICATIONS

机译:重型轨道应用的路控路程和可逆晶闸管控制整流器(RTCR)的比较

获取原文

摘要

There had been a substantial interest in the traction community to use wayside Energy Storage Systems (ESS) to better utilize train braking energy and thus achieve reduction of energy cost and peak power, and voltage stabilization. An alternative solution to reach the same goals is using recuperating (also called regenerating) traction power stations such as a Reversible Thyristor Controlled Rectifiers (RTCR). The paper compares advantages and disadvantages of ESS of three most common types - flywheels, batteries and supercapacitors - and RTCR. The analysis takes into account size, capital cost, the "round trip" energy losses and energy savings for heavy rail applications.
机译:在牵引社区中有很大的兴趣,使用Wayside储能系统(ESS)来更好地利用火车制动能量,从而实现能量成本和峰值功率的降低,以及电压稳定。达到相同目标的替代解决方案正在使用诸如可逆晶闸管控制整流器(RTCR)的恢复(也称为再生)牵引力站。该论文比较了IS的三种最常用类型的优缺点 - 飞轮,电池和超级电容器和RTCR。分析考虑了大小,资本成本,“往返”能源损失和重型铁路应用的节能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号