【24h】

PHR, We've Had a Problem Here

机译:Phr,我们这里有一个问题

获取原文

摘要

Personal health records (PHRs) have been a global trend in recent decade. It has been seen as a concept and tool that could help patients maintaining health, improving their well-being, and supporting communication with healthcare professional etc. Despite the great amount of research about PHR there is no consensus what a PHR actually means in academic literature or other arenas. There are multiple terms in use and multiple definitions which set challenges for rational discourse between citizens/patient, healthcare providers, system developers and policy makers. Especially, when citizens-as key stakeholder-should also be able to understand what those systems are we need clear and understandable definition for PHR's. In the paper, we conduct a brief survey for different definitions and show the problems that arise with the incoherent use of the term "PHR".
机译:近十年来,个人健康记录(PHRS)一直是全球趋势。它被视为一种概念和工具,可以帮助患者保持健康,改善他们的福祉,以及支持与医疗专业人士的沟通等。尽管有大量关于PHR的研究,但PHR实际上在学术文学中的意思是什么或其他竞技场。有多种使用术语和多种定义,这些定义在公民/患者,医疗保健提供者,系统开发商和政策制定者之间制定了合理话语的挑战。特别是,当公民 - 作为关键利益相关者 - 也应该能够了解这些系统的哪些系统是什么需要清晰和可理解的phr。在论文中,我们对不同的定义进行了简短的调查,并显示出在“PHR”术语不连贯的使用中出现的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号