首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Information Science and Engineering >Study on Mine Environmental Quality Evaluation Index System and Method: A case Study in Panxi Hongge Vanadium-Titanium Magnetite
【24h】

Study on Mine Environmental Quality Evaluation Index System and Method: A case Study in Panxi Hongge Vanadium-Titanium Magnetite

机译:矿井环境质量评价指标体系与方法研究 - 以潘溪宏钒 - 钛磁铁矿为例

获取原文

摘要

Through investigating different types of Mining, guiding by principles of science, integrity, practicality, lead and level, this study established a scientific and practical evaluation system of the mine environment quality which can provide a theoretical basis for evaluating the quality of mine environment objectively. Using expert experience evaluation method, the subsystems of mine environment quality evaluation and their evaluation index weights were determined, and mine environment quality index calculation methods based on the grid cell were given. At the same time, in order to better express the spatial distribution situation of environmental quality, the surface simulation of mine environment quality (spatial interpolation) using grid-based unit of environmental of mine as a sample point index were given. According with the mine environmental quality index, the environment quality of mine was divided into three grades, which were poor (MEQI <40), general (40 ? MEQI ? 70), good (MEQI> 70). Based on index system and methods of the mine environment evaluation been established, taking Panxi Hongge vanadium-titanium magnetite as an example, using remote sensing and GIS technology, applying IKONOS remote sensing images and related meteorological, geological and socio-economic data, the environmental quality of the mining area were evaluated. The results showed that: The environment quality which was poor of Hongge mine were mainly distributed in the region around Panjiatian - Xiaoheijing iron ore, Maanshan iron ore and Hongge iron ore. The areas of the three grades of mine environmental quality which was good, general and poor were 28%, 58% and 14% respectively. Open pit and waste rock piled up which occupied vast land resources, the damage of vegetation, a large number of geological disasters, large-scale and more hidden danger of geological disasters Caused by mining activities was the main reason for the environmental damage of the mining area.
机译:通过调查不同类型的采矿,通过科学原则,诚信,实用性,领导和水平指导,建立了矿井环境质量的科学实践评价体系,可以为客观地评估矿井环境质量的理论依据。使用专家体验评估方法,确定了矿山环境质量评价及其评价指标权重,给出了基于网格电池的矿山环境质量指标计算方法。同时,为了更好地表达环境质量的空间分配情况,给出了使用基于网格环境的矿井环境质量(空间插值)作为样品点指数的矿井环境质量(空间插值)的表面模拟。根据矿山环境质量指数,矿井的环境质量分为三个等级,差(Meqi <40),一般(40?Meqi?70),好(Meqi> 70)。基于矿井环境评估的指标体系和方法,以潘溪弘钒 - 钛磁铁矿为例,采用遥感和GIS技术,应用Ikonos遥感图像及相关的气象,地质和社会经济数据,环境评估采矿区的质量。结果表明:弘扬贫困地雷的环境质量主要分布在潘正日 - 小河铁矿,马鞍山铁矿石和铁铁矿石中的地区。矿井环境质量的三个等级的领域分别为28%,58%和14%。露台和废物岩石堆积占据广阔的土地资源,植被损害,大量地质灾害,大规模和更隐患的采矿活动引起的地质灾害是矿业环境损害的主要原因区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号