首页> 外文会议>ACEEE Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry >Prioritizing Energy Efficiency in Municipalities
【24h】

Prioritizing Energy Efficiency in Municipalities

机译:优先考虑市政当局的能效

获取原文

摘要

Local governments often hold a wide range of facilities in their portfolio, all with unique and different end uses. The list of facilities for city or county governments can include swimming pools, office buildings, educational facilities, and water and wastewater treatment plants. There is great potential to reduce energy costs in these facilities by focusing on retrofitting inefficient systems, instituting behavioral and operational policies, and creatively encouraging energy efficiency in building occupants. Even with this immense opportunity to save energy and other resources, municipalities often lack the budget, staff and focus to make energy conservation a priority:Facilities managers are frequently occupied with day-to-day building operations and are unavailable to focus on capital improvements until a system failure occurs. Tight municipal budgets discourage early replacement of energy-intensive systems and often limit the ability to implement more efficient products when replacement is necessary. Life-cycle cost considerations are trumped by immediate budget shortfalls. Behavioral and operational-based energy consumption is often ignored by facilities operators due to the level of attention that tracking this consumption requires. Also, municipal staff often lacks an understanding of how to best achieve meaningful behavioral and operational changes. Puget Sound Energy's Resource Conservation Manager (RCM) Program is designed to provide coordination and leadership for effective and efficient management of all utility resources and focus on energy efficiency through behavioral changes, operational improvements, maintenance activities and capital improvements. Through the combined use of these programs, cities and counties can invest in energy-efficient improvements across the spectrum of their facilities. It is the intent of this paper to explore a specific case study, the City of Bellingham, WA, to provide an example of how a city-utility partnership can gain the budget, staff and focus necessary to make energy efficiency a priority.
机译:地方政府经常在他们的投资组合中举办广泛的设施,所有这些设施都具有独特而不同的最终用途。城市或县政府的设施清单可包括游泳池,办公楼,教育设施和水和废水处理厂。通过专注于改造低效系统,机构行为和运营政策,以及创造性地鼓励建立居住者的能源效率,可以降低这些设施中的能源成本。即使在这种巨大的机会拯救了能源和其他资源,市政当局往往缺乏预算,员工和重点,使节能优先提示:设施经理经常占据日常建筑运营,并无法关注资本改进发生系统故障。紧密的市政预算阻止早期更换能量密集型系统,并且通常限制必要时更换更高效的产品的能力。通过立即预算缺口,生命周期成本考虑因素被胜过。由于跟踪此消耗的关注程度,设施运营商通常忽略了行为和基于操作的能耗。此外,市政人员往往缺乏对如何最佳实现有意义的行为和操作变化的理解。 Puget Sound Energy的资源保护经理(RCM)计划旨在为所有公用事业资源的有效和高效管理提供协调和领导,并通过行为变更,运营改进,维护活动和资本改进专注于能源效率。通过联合使用这些方案,城市和县可以投资其设施频谱的节能改进。本文的目的是探索一个特定的案例研究,贝灵汉市,湾,提供了一个城市公用事业合作伙伴关系如何获得预算,员工和能源效率所必需的预算优先事项的一个例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号