首页> 外文会议>AIChE National Meeting >TAKING THE PETRO OUT OF PETROCHEMICALS OLD FEEDSTOCK OPTIONS REVISITED
【24h】

TAKING THE PETRO OUT OF PETROCHEMICALS OLD FEEDSTOCK OPTIONS REVISITED

机译:将Petro从石油化工中重新审视了

获取原文

摘要

One hundred years ago, most non-fuel industrial products, including chemicals were made from biomass (plants, trees and vegetables) or coal / coal tars. Since then, industrial chemical production has been dominated by petroleum based feedstocks. More recently, high oil and gas prices, dwindling domestic reserves and growing demand for transport fuels and chemicals in rapidly growing or large established economies such as the U.S., China and India have refocused attention back on these "old" feedstocks. Moreover, environmental concerns have resulted in mandated legislation for "renewable content" in fuels that are focusing efforts on improving the technologies and cost position for chemicals used as fuels (e.g. ethanol and biodiesel). Coal's abundance, relatively low pricing / price volatility and developments in technologies that improve its cost position and environmental performance are supporting trends. While coal's reputation as a "dirty" fuel in the West is slowing its penetration, realities suggest that it will become a larger share of the future global energy mix with corresponding impacts on chemical feedstocks. The implication for chemicals is becoming clearer. The political and technological advancements for coal and biomass will offer chemical producers alternatives other than traditional petroleum feedstocks. This paper will address the current issues facing chemical producers interested in diversifying and expanding by utilizing the two primary alternative feedstock alternatives to traditional petroleum feedstocks, biomass and coal. It will examine the economics associated with their use and explore the realities of the technologies available today and highlight the associated issues driving or inhibiting their use into chemicals. Finally, it will provide a brief economic snapshot and investment comparison of a coal-to-polyolefins facility in China vs. Middle East E/P cracking and liquids cracking in China.
机译:一百年前,大多数非燃料工业产品,包括化学品,由生物量(植物,树木和蔬菜)或煤/煤焦油制成。从那时起,工业化学生产一直由石油基原料支配。最近,石油和天然气价格高,国内储备疲劳,越来越多的运输燃料和化学品在快速增长或大型成立的经济体中,如美国,中国和印度,这些原料已经重新介绍了这些“旧”原料。此外,环境问题导致了“可再生内容”中的“可再生内容”的立法,以改善用作燃料(例如乙醇和生物柴油)的化学物质的技术和成本立场。煤炭丰富,相对较低的定价/价格波动和技术的发展,提高其成本职位和环境绩效的支持趋势。虽然煤炭在西方的“肮脏”燃料中的声誉正在放缓其渗透,但现实情况表明它将成为未来全球能源组合的更大份额,具有对化学原料的相应影响。化学品的含义变得更加清晰。煤炭和生物量的政治和技术进步将提供除传统的石油原料以外的化学制造商替代品。本文将通过利用传统的石油原料,生物质和煤炭的两种主要替代原料替代品来解决对多元化和扩展有兴趣的现有问题。它将研究与其使用相关的经济学,并探索今天提供的技术的现实,并突出驾驶或抑制其对化学品的相关问题。最后,它将提供中国煤与煤层设施的简要经济快照和投资比较。中国中东E / P开裂和液体开裂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号