首页> 外文会议>WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer and Applied Computational Science >Automatic Creation of Countermeasure Plan against Process Delay: Creation of Countermeasures based on Crashing and Fast-tracking
【24h】

Automatic Creation of Countermeasure Plan against Process Delay: Creation of Countermeasures based on Crashing and Fast-tracking

机译:自动创建对策延误的对策计划:基于崩溃和快速跟踪的对策创建

获取原文

摘要

Success or failure of a software project mainly depends on the management capability of the project manager. Therefore, EVA (Earned Value Analysis) is gaining much attention recently as a method of managing a project in an integrated fashion by introducing a unified metric called EV (Earned Value) and quantitatively measuring and analyzing the cost and schedule of a project. Project managers can use EVA to estimate SEAC (Schedule Estimate At Completion) and EAC (Estimate At Completion). However, since EVA does not include constraints as a factor for assigning human resources, such as the available periods of each person, etc., EVA quite often generates inaccurate estimations for SEAC and EAC. In addition, suppose that a situation arises due to a delay in project progress, in which the deadline cannot be met if the project proceeds as is with no countermeasures adopted. In this case, it is necessary to provide a prospect that indicates whether the project can be completed within the original delivery deadline (i.e., the original delivery deadline can be met) or not if any countermeasures are adopted to recover the process delay. If there is some way to bring the project back to its original schedule and complete it within the assigned time table, it is necessary to be able to present the countermeasure or an actual development plan. However, EVA cannot be used to show such a prospect or present the means to restore the project to its original timeline even if such countermeasures exist. This paper proposes a method to solve these problems and discusses its effectiveness by comparing the authors' approach with that of the EVA.
机译:软件项目的成功或失败主要取决于项目经理的管理能力。因此,Eva(赢得的价值分析)最近正在赢得很多关注,作为通过称为EV(获得价值)的统一度量和定量测量和分析项目的成本和计划来以集成方式管理项目的方法。项目经理可以使用EVA来估算SEAC(计划估计)和EAC(在完成时估计)。然而,由于EVA不包括限制作为分配人力资源的因素,例如每个人的可用时段等,因此EVA通常会产生对SEAC和EAC的不准确估计。此外,假设由于项目进度延迟而导致的情况出现,其中如果项目进行,则不能满足截止日期,因为没有通过对策。在这种情况下,有必要提供指示项目是否可以在原始交付截止日内完成(即,可以满足原始交付截止日期),如果采用任何对策来恢复过程延迟,则可以提供原始交付截止日期。如果有某种方式将项目带回其原始计划并在指定的时间表内完成它,则必须能够提供对策或实际的发展计划。但是,即使存在此类对策,EVA不能用于显示这样的前景或者展示恢复项目的手段,以便将项目恢复到其原始时间表。本文提出了一种解决这些问题的方法,并通过将作者对EVA的方法进行比较来讨论其有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号