首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds >Opportunities and constraints for the biological control of weeds in Europe
【24h】

Opportunities and constraints for the biological control of weeds in Europe

机译:欧洲杂草生物控制的机遇和制约因素

获取原文

摘要

Although there has been increasing interest in Europe over the last few decades in trying to harness the potential of biological control as a management tool for weeds, securing funding for projects continues to be problematic whilst the successes have been limited. The incentives to use alternative technology are based on a number of interrelated factors, not least the dramatic rise in popularity of organic products (linked to increasing environmental awareness) and a powerful anti-GMO lobby. Combine this with new legislation to remove some chemical herbicides from the market or to restrict their usage, as well as soaring development costs for new products, and the opportunities for biological control have never been better. Here, we analyse the reasons for the limited uptake, and the challenges or constraints facing weed biocontrol from two different approaches: classical and inundative. For classical biological control against invasive alien weeds, Europe has lagged behind other continents (e.g.Australasia, North America) to the point that there have been no introductions thus far, whilst those that are in the pipeline still need to clear considerable legislative hurdles. These issues are highlighted for past and ongoing projects. For inundative biological control against indigenous or naturalized weeds—in this case, the use of products based on plant pathogens (bioherbicides)— the constraints are largely technological and commercial rather than bureaucratic: e.g. stability and efficacy; costs of production and registration; and limited markets. Opportunities to support the study and use of mycoherbicides, and strategies to overcome these constraints—improving production, formulation and application systems; genetic enhancement; synergistic mixtures of agents/metabolites —are discussed.
机译:虽然有在试图利用生物防治的潜力作为杂草管理工具,为项目获得资金,在过去的几十年里一直在增加兴趣欧洲仍然是有问题而成功是有限的。使用替代技术的奖励是基于若干相互关联的因素,尤其是在有机产品普及率的急剧上升(与提高环保意识)和一个强大的反GMO大厅。而新的立法结合这从市场上去除一些化学除草剂或限制其使用,以及飙升的新产品的开发成本,并为生物控制的机遇从来没有这样好过。在这里,我们分析了吸收有限,从两种不同的方法所面临的杂草生物防治的原因,以及所面临的挑战和制约因素:古典与inundative。针对外来入侵杂草传统生物防治,欧洲已经落后于其他大洲(e.g.Australasia,北美)到点背后没有出现过推出迄今,而那些在管道仍然需要相当明确立法障碍。这些问题都强调了过去的和正在进行的项目。对于针对土著或归inundative生物控制杂草-在这种情况下,产品的使用基于植物病原体(生物除草剂) - 约束在很大程度上是技术和商业而非官僚主义:例如稳定性和效力;生产和登记的成本;和有限的市场。机会来支持研究和使用真菌除草剂的,和战略来克服这些制约因素,提高生产,配方和应用系统;遗传改良;代理协同混合物/代谢物-are讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号