【24h】

Assessing Chemical Status of Shared Groundwater Resources: A Crucial Political, Regulatory and Management Issue

机译:评估共享地下水资源的化学地位:一个至关重要的政治,监管和管理问题

获取原文

摘要

According to the EU Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EU (WFD, 2000) and the project of the Daughter Groundwater Directive (GWD, 2003), water chemical status should be assessed for all usable groundwater bodies (GWBs) or group of bodies to identify any significant and sustained upward trend of concentrations of pollutants found in these bodies of groundwater, and define the starting point for trend reversals. Groundwater is a resource at risk, thus correct assessment of its chemical status and identification of risk, in particular in shared groundwater bodies is of a vital importance and has significant political dimension as a potential source of conflicts. The presented studies carried out on two selected objects within the EU 5FP BASELINE and 6FP BRIDGE projects were aimed to contribute to evaluating natural baseline quality in European Aquifer and to establishing reliable common approach for assessing groundwater chemical status based on the criteria set by WFD (2000) and GWD (2003), and with using also national regulations and threshold values (RMS, 2004). Assessment of groundwater chemical status performed in parallel in the point and spatial mode based on aggregation with use of median values proved this procedure to be the most appropriate. Application of the point method enables visualization of areas (within the drainage basin or groundwater bodies) of different groundwater chemical status for a correct decision-making, early identification of a risk and timely undertaking interception/reversal actions for restoration of good groundwater status. Spatial assessment of groundwater chemical status on the basis of concentration data aggregated with use of either mean or median values was proved to cause over- or underestimation of risks that lead to wrong decisions resulting in considerable economic losses, possible damage to human health and the environment, and to unavoidable conflicts in case of shared groundwater resources. The spatial assessment was found to be more reliable if performed on the basis of median values, and not of arithmetic mean, as recommended by WFD (2000) and GWD (2003). This results from the fact that chemical constituents of groundwater usually display log-normal distribution, and in this case median is not susceptible to a deformation to such extent as mean value. In GWBs of multilayer structure, assessing groundwater chemical status should be accomplished separately for groundwater of shallow and deeper circulation due to different exposure to contamination sources.
机译:根据欧盟水框架指令2000/60 / EU(WFD,2000)和女儿地下水指令(GWD,2003)的项目,应评估所有可用地下水(GWB)或尸体组的水化学地位确定这些地下水尸体中发现的污染物浓度的任何显着和持续的上升趋势,并确定了趋势逆转的起点。地下水是一种有风险的资源,从而正确评估其化学地位和风险识别,特别是共享地下水机构的重要性至关重要,并具有重要的政治维度作为潜在的冲突来源。在欧盟5FP基线和6FP桥梁项目中的两个选定物体上进行的本研究旨在为评估欧洲含水层的自然基线质量,并建立基于WFD(2000年的标准)评估地下水化学地位的可靠共同方法)和GWD(2003),以及使用国家法规和门槛值(RMS,2004)。基于使用中值值的基于聚集在聚集的点和空间模式下并行评估地下水化学状态证明了这一程序是最合适的。点方法的应用能够可视化不同地下水化学地位的区域(排水盆或地下水体),以便正确的决策,早期识别风险和及时进行拦截/逆转行动,以恢复良好的地下水位。被证明,使用平均值或中位数的浓度数据基于浓度数据的地下水化学地位的空间评估,导致导致错误决策的风险过度或低估导致具有相当大的经济损失,对人类健康和环境的可能损害,在共享地下水资源的情况下和不可避免的冲突。如果基于中位数值执行,则发现空间评估更可靠,而不是WFD(2000)和GWD(2003)的建议。这导致了地下水的化学成分通常显示了对数正态分布的事实,并且在这种情况下,中值不易受变形的程度,如平均值。在多层结构的GWB中,由于不同暴露于污染源,评估地下水化学地位应分开为地下水进行地下水,因为暴露于污染源。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号