首页> 外文会议>IASTED Africa Conference on Water Resource Management >ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY IN RAINFALL FREQUENCY ESTIMATION
【24h】

ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY IN RAINFALL FREQUENCY ESTIMATION

机译:参数不确定性在降雨频率估计中的影响分析

获取原文

摘要

Using daily rainfall data taken from fifteen gauge stations selected from across South Africa, a Bayesian and an L-moments approach to extreme rainfall frequency estimation were compared. The Bayesian approach enables distribution parameter uncertainties to be taken into account unlike the L moments and other probability weighed moment approaches and the comparison therefore helped evaluate the effect of incorporating parameter uncertainty on extreme rainfall estimates. To implement the Bayesian approach, the Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) was used to model the exceedances of rainfall data over a threshold that had been chosen from a mean residual life plot of the rainfall data. The joint prior distribution which had been formulated for the shape and scale parameters of the Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) was sequentially modified by the rainfall data resulting in a posterior distribution from which a Markov chain was generated using the Gibbs Sampler. This output of the Gibbs sampler was then used to obtain estimates of rainfall magnitudes at various return periods. These estimates were compared to those obtained using the regional storm index method which uses the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution and L-moments for parameter estimation. Generally, the Bayesian estimates of rainfall magnitudes for all return periods were greater than the corresponding estimates of rainfall magnitudes obtained by the regional storm index methodology. However, the differences between corresponding estimates increased with the length of the return period and for the shorter return periods, the estimates by the two methods were reasonably similar. At the 100 and the 200- year return periods, the Bayesian estimates were greater by 63.2% and 87.5% respectively. These differences in extreme rainfall magnitudes are considered to be the result of incorporating parameter uncertainties in the Bayesian approach. Although flood mitigation design is often wrought with many uncertainties, the considerable impact of incorporating parameter uncertainties calls for a comprehensive review of extreme rainfall estimation methods in South Africa and elsewhere.
机译:比较了使用从南非横跨南非的十五个规格站采取的日降雨数据,比较了一个贝叶斯和L-MOCENTES来实现极端降雨频率估算的方法。贝叶斯方法可以实现分布参数不确定性,以考虑L矩和其他概率称重的时刻方法,因此有助于评估在极端降雨估计上纳入参数不确定性的效果。为了实现贝叶斯方法,广义帕匹官分布(GPD)用于在从降雨数据的平均残余寿命图中选择的阈值来模拟降雨数据的超标。已经制定的用于形状和规模参数的联合分布通过降雨数据顺序修饰,导致使用GIBBS采样器产生马尔可夫链的后部分布。然后使用GIBBS采样器的该输出来获得各种返回期的降雨量估计。将这些估计与使用使用广义极值(GEV)分布的区域风暴指数方法获得的估计进行比较,该方法和L-MOCENTS用于参数估计。通常,所有返回时期的降雨幅度的贝叶斯估计大于区域风暴指数方法获得的降雨幅度的相应估计。然而,相应估计之间的差异随着返回周期的长度和较短返回期的差异而增加,两种方法的估计是相似的。在100和200年的返回期间,贝叶斯估计分别较长63.2%和87.5%。这些极端降雨大小的这些差异被认为是在贝叶斯方法中纳入参数不确定性的结果。虽然洪水缓解设计往往具有许多不确定性,但纳入参数不确定性的相当大的影响要求对南非和其他地方的极端降雨估算方法进行全面审查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号