首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies >Comparison of Attribute Selection Techniques and Algorithms in Classifying Bad Behaviors of Vocational Education Students
【24h】

Comparison of Attribute Selection Techniques and Algorithms in Classifying Bad Behaviors of Vocational Education Students

机译:职业教育学生分类差别行为中的属性选择技术与算法的比较

获取原文

摘要

This study presents the comparison of attribute selection techniques which used for classifying the bad behaviors of vocational education students. There are two classification methods: hybrid classification and single classification. Hybrid classification includes two steps, step one is attribute selection by search method using genetic search and results are compared by three evaluators: 1) Correlation-based Feature Selection (CFS) 2) Consistency-based Subset Evaluation and 3) Wrapper Subset Evaluation. Step two is the classification of data set by using selected attributed from step one and four classification algorithms. Next, Simple classification used classification algorithms only without attribute selection. The four classification algorithms that used in this experiment for comparing in two methods are: 1) Naive Bayes classifier 2) Baysian Belief Network 3) C4.5 algorithm and 4) RIPPER algorithm. The measurements of classification efficiency had been obtained by using the k-fold Cross Validation technique. From the experiment, it was found that hybrid classification technique using genetic search and CFS evaluator with C4.5 algorithm, gives the highest accuracy rate at 82.52%. However, results from F-measure evaluation showed that C4.5 algorithm did not fit for all data types. The hybrid classification technique using genetic search and wrapper subset with Baysian belief network can give a better precision value which can be seen in the F-measure, and it gives the accuracy rate at 82.42%.
机译:本研究提出了属性选择技术的比较,这些技术用于对职业教育学生的不良行为进行分类。有两种分类方法:混合分类和单一分类。混合分类包括两个步骤,步骤1是通过使用基因搜索的搜索方法的属性选择,结果由三个评估者进行比较:1)基于相关的特征选择(CFS)2)基于相关的基于的子集评估和3)包装子集评估。步骤二是通过使用从步骤1和四个分类算法的所选归属的数据集的分类。接下来,简单的分类仅使用分类算法而没有属性选择。该实验中使用的四种分类算法以两种方法进行比较为:1)朴素贝雷斯分类器2)贝塞信仰网络3)C4.5算法和4)Ripper算法。通过使用K折叠交叉验证技术获得了分类效率的测量。从实验开始,发现使用基因搜索和CFS评估器具有C4.5算法的混合分类技术,使最高精度率为82.52%。但是,F测量评估结果表明C4.5算法不适合所有数据类型。使用遗传搜索和包装板与贝西信仰网络的包装技术的混合分类技术可以提供更好的精度值,可以在F测量中看到,并且它可以在82.42%的精度率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号