首页> 外文会议>Annual International Irrigation Show >Potential Runoff and Erosion Comparison of Center Pivot Sprinklers on Three Idaho Soils
【24h】

Potential Runoff and Erosion Comparison of Center Pivot Sprinklers on Three Idaho Soils

机译:潜在的径流和侵蚀中心枢轴喷头在三个伊纳荷州土壤上的侵蚀比较

获取原文

摘要

The operational characteristics of center pivot sprinklers are well documented but few studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects that operating characteristics of a particular sprinkler have on infiltration, runoff, and erosion of specific soil types. The objective of this study was to evaluate potential runoff and erosion from common commercial center pivot sprinklers on three widely distributed, south central Idaho soils. A modified commercial irrigation boom system was used to emulate center pivot irrigation on experimental runoff plots. Sprinklers used in the study were: 1) Nelson R3000 with brown plate, 2) Nelson R3000 with red plate, 3) Nelson S3000 with purple plate, and 4) Senninger l-Wob with standard 9-groove plate. There were significant differences in runoff and erosion rates between sprinkler types for the soils tested and experimental conditions. The l-Wob exhibited the highest overall runoff and erosion rates and the R3000 sprinklers exhibited the lowest rates for the threesoils tested. In general, sprinkler types that visually appear to more uniformly distribute sprinkler droplets over the wetted area with respect to time exhibited the highest runoff and erosion rates. The relative differences in runoff between the sprinklers tested for the three soils were not directly proportional to droplet kinetic energy. This outcome is in conflict with conventional theory on soil surface sealing from droplet impact.
机译:中心枢轴洒水器的操作特性良好记录,但已经进行了很少的研究以评估特定喷水器的操作特性对特定土壤类​​型的渗透,径流和腐蚀的影响。本研究的目的是评估普通商业中心枢轴洒水器的潜在径流和侵蚀,在三个广泛分布的南部中央爱达荷州土壤中。修改后的商业灌溉繁荣系统用于模拟实验径流图的中心枢轴灌溉。在该研究中使用的洒水器是:1)纳尔逊R3000与棕色板,2)纳尔逊R3000带红色板,3)尼尔森S3000与紫色板,4)森林仪L-WOB配有标准9槽板。用于土壤测试和实验条件的洒水器类型之间的径流和侵蚀率存在显着差异。 L-WOB展出了最高的整体径流和侵蚀率,R3000洒水喷水率呈现出测试的三裂性的最低速率。通常,随着时间的时间呈现出在湿润区域上的更均匀地分布喷洒器液滴的喷洒器类型表现出最高的径流和侵蚀速率。对三种土壤测试的洒水器之间的径流的相对差异与液滴动能不正常成比例。这种结果与液体表面密封的传统理论冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号