首页> 外文会议>International Association of Drilling Contractors and Society of Petroleum Engineers Drilling Conference and Exhibition >Detailed Post-Event Analysis of Drilling Problems Significantly Alters the Root Cause Reality for Technical Sidetracks
【24h】

Detailed Post-Event Analysis of Drilling Problems Significantly Alters the Root Cause Reality for Technical Sidetracks

机译:钻孔问题的详细事件分析显着改变了技术侧面的根本原因现实

获取原文

摘要

Statoil has drilled an average of 30 technical sidetracks yearly since 2000, and a significant portion of the total drilling and well technology costs is related to these operations. A twoyear project was initiated in 2004 to investigate the causes for the technical sidetracks. The project’s main objective is to reduce drilling cost related to technical sidetracks. One of the main activities in the project is the detailed post-event analyses to capture the root causes of the technical sidetracks. The analysis process includes, amongst other factors, interpretation of time based drilling and formation evaluation (FE) data. This activity was conducted throughout 2005 and is still ongoing. A total of 24 detailed analyses have been concluded with a direct cause and a corresponding root cause. The three major findings from these analyses were: 1) Little consistency between reasons for sidetrack reported in daily drilling reports compared with root causes found from the detailed analyses. 2) Marked reduction in formation related causes. 3) Operational practice accounts for 10 of the 24 technical sidetrack root causes. The majority of the technical sidetracks, according to the daily drilling report system, is due to formation related problems. However, the findings from the detailed analyses conclude that operational practice constitutes the major root cause. The picture is somewhat more differentiated, since the complex nature of some incidents results in several root cause related to both downhole mechanisms and operational practice. These observations enforce an increased focus on the operational practice, I.e. how to conduct specific drilling operations and also how to handle drilling challenges. This paper presents why this knowledge is of great value during both planning and operations phase. Furthermore, it concludes that this type of detailed analysis significantly accelerates the learning outcome with regards to drilling operation challenges and the diagnosis of these, thus promoting a more proactive working methodology throughout the organization.
机译:STATOIL自2000年以来平均钻取了30次技术侧面的技术侧面,并且总钻井和技术成本的一部分与这些操作有关。 2004年启动了一个互工项目,以调查技术侧面的原因。该项目的主要目标是减少与技术侧面相关的钻井成本。该项目的主要活动之一是捕获技术侧面的根本原因的详细后事件分析。分析过程包括在其他因素中,解释基于时间的钻井和形成评估(FE)数据。这项活动是在整个2005年进行的,仍在进行。总共24种详细分析,直接原因和对应的根本原因。来自这些分析的三个主要发现是:1)与从详细分析中发现的根本原因相比,日常钻探报告中报告的侧面的原因之间的一致性几乎没有。 2)形成相关原因的明显减少。 3)操作实践占24个技术侧面原因中的10个。根据日常钻探报告系统的大部分技术侧面是由于形成相关问题。然而,详细分析的调查结果得出结论,运营实践构成了主要根本原因。图片有些更差异化,因为某些事件的复杂性质导致与井下机制和操作实践相关的若干根本原因。这些观察结果强制了对操作实践的重点,即如何进行特定的钻探操作,以及如何处理钻孔挑战。本文介绍了在规划和运营阶段,为什么这种知识具有重要价值。此外,它的结论是,这种详细分析明显加速了关于钻探运营挑战和这些诊断的学习结果,从而促进整个组织的更积极主动的工作方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号