首页> 外文会议>Reliability and Maintainability Symposium >Comparative Analysis of Static and Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Static and Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment

机译:静态和动态概率风险评估的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

This study examines three different methodologies for producing loss-of-mission (LOM) and loss-of-crew (LOC) risks estimates for probabilistic risk assessments (PRA) of crewed spacecraft. The three bottom-up, component-based PRA approaches examined are a traditional static fault tree, a dynamic Monte Carlo simulation, and a fault tree hybrid that incorporates some dynamic elements. These approaches were used to model the reaction control system thruster pod of a generic crewed spacecraft and mission, and a comparative analysis of the methods is presented.
机译:本研究审查了三种不同的方法,用于制作任务丧失(LOM)和损失(LOC)风险估算的概率风险评估(PRA)的概率风险评估(PRA)。检查的三种自下而上的基于组件的PRA方法是传统的静态故障树,动态蒙特卡罗模拟和一个包含一些动态元素的故障树混合动力。这些方法用于模拟通用营收的航天器和任务的反应控制系统推进器豆荚,并提出了对方法的比较分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号