首页> 外文会议>International Congress of Maxillofacial and Craniofacial Distraction >Years Experience of Midface and Forehead Distraction Using Internal Devices
【24h】

Years Experience of Midface and Forehead Distraction Using Internal Devices

机译:多年的Middade经验和使用内部设备的额头分散注意力

获取原文

摘要

Since 1996, we performed 59 eases of midface distraction with/without forehead distraction for 55 patients. For 43 of 55 patients, Le Fort III midface distraction was performed. Le Fort IV simultaneous forehead and midface distraction was carried out for 12 patients,Distraction device is internal type that was devised in our unit,Diseases were syndromic craniosynostosis in 37 cases, frontonasal dyspla-sia in 9 cases, various facial cleft with midface hypoplasia in 11 cases and facial trauma in 2 cases. The patient age varied from 6 months to 42 years, mean 14 years. The mean follow-up period was 71 months (6 - 120 months),Satisfactory results were achieved in 54 of 59 distraction cases, Midface distraction was carried out twice in four patients in whom a satisfactory result could not be achieved at the first distraction.Relapse of the distracted midface were minimal, It seems that midface distraction is superior to the conventional osteotomy and bone grafting method Midface distraction can be well applied to the maxillary hypoplasia patient in whom the midface should be advanced more than 10 mm,
机译:自1996年以来,我们进行了有/面中部分心的59个EASES无额头分心55个例。为43 55的患者,进行乐堡III面中部分心。乐堡IV同时前额和面中部分心反应进行12例,牵引装置是,在我们的单元设计内部类型,疾病是37例综合征性颅缝早闭,额鼻dyspla-SIA 9例,各种面部裂带面中部发育不全在11例2例面部外伤。 6个月〜42年患者年龄,平均14年。平均随访时间为71个月(6 - 120月),满意的结果在59的54分心的情况下实现的,面中部分心于在其中一个令人满意的结果不能在第一分神实现四个病人进行两次。的分心面中部的复发是最小的,看来面中部分心是优于常规的截骨和骨移植方法分心面中部可以很好地适用于上颌骨发育不全病人在其中面中部应大于10mm前进,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号