首页> 外文会议>Iron and Steel Technology Conference >Innovative Vacuum-Tank Degassing Technologies: Well-Established Metallurgical Performance Figures Achieved by Using Dry Mechanical Pumps
【24h】

Innovative Vacuum-Tank Degassing Technologies: Well-Established Metallurgical Performance Figures Achieved by Using Dry Mechanical Pumps

机译:创新的真空罐脱气技术:通过使用干机械泵实现的良好的冶金性能图

获取原文

摘要

With increasing demands for highly performing and at the same time efficient and running-costs saving vacuum-degassing equipment, dry-mechanical pumps have been confirmed a proper choice to completely fulfill the expectations of steel-making companies worldwide. Regarding the production of both special carbon steel and stainless steel grades, the usage of mentioned pumps allowed reaching simultaneous remarkable results from different viewpoints in various Danieli worldwide installations (treating up to 200 t of liquid steel). As a matter of fact, in front of the replacement of a widely spread and renowned steam-ejector pumps technology with the recently developed technology embodied by the dry-mechanical vacuum pumps (MVP), well-established metallurgical performances in terms of carbon-hydrogen-nitrogen-sulphur removal have been repeatedly attained while meeting at the same time the client's expectations concerning, for example, running-costs and "push-button" availability. Regarding running-costs it is already well known that by replacing a Steam Ejector Vacuum Pump equipped with Water Ring Pumps (WRP-SVP) with a MVP degassing system allows a running-cost reduction of around 70-90%. It must be pointed out that one of the main differences between the degassing systems equipped with MVP and SVP is their designed suction capacity: for a VD-VOD process the usual provided specific suction capacity of the MVP is ranging between 1.0-1.5kg/h/t of liquid steel, while for SVP it is ranging between 2.5-3.0kg/h/t of liquid steel. This difference originates from the higher MVP specific investment-costs (euro/kg/h) if compared to SVP, especially for heat sizes higher than 100-120 t even though year after year the capital costs of the MVP become more and more competitive. The practically identical results obtained from both pump systems from productivity and metallurgy point of view, despite the difference in the designed suction capacity for the same equipment, are justified by the following reasons: the designing of the overall VD-equipment and process when a MVP is included in the plant has been optimized in order to diminish as much as possible additional gas loads as, for example, the equipment leakages and the additional nitrogen/argon load to the pumps. The lower suction capacity is directly linked with an increased importance of proper maintenance activities. SVP (if not provided with an upstream textile filter) has to compensate a gradual performance loss caused by the dust deposit on the steam-ejector body internal wallsv For MVP-based equipment all the volume dbwnstream the Main Shut-Off Valve (MSOV) is partially or deeply pre-evacuated before starting a VD-VOD treatment. Thanks to the very flexible, modular, redundant and maintenance-friendly equipment design, random problems occurring to the singular mechanical pumps can be easily solved without affecting the VD-VOD plant availability and metallurgical performance. Whenever a pump malfunction starts to appear, depending on the MVP layout configuration, either the singular pump is isolated from the remaining pumps by closing both pump upstream and downstream on/off valves or the pump pertinent skid is isolated from the system by closing its skid valve. It must be highlighted that even when working with one or more pumps isolated due to temporary malfunctions, the final quality of steel can be still guaranteed. With a particular regard to the VOD process, a very short overall process-time has been repeatedly performed (averagely less than 58min under-vacuum time at ChMP~1) while guaranteeing the expected required quality of the final refined stainless steel. Moreover, in several VOD installations (ranging from 6t up to 1 l0t of liquid steel) an efficient automatic process control such as dynamic pressure-regulation during oxygen-blowing has been attained thanks to the controllable variable-speed drives with which each mechanical pump is provided.
机译:随着需求的高度进行,并在同一时间高效运行,成本节约真空脱气设备,干式机械泵已被证实正确的选择完全履行全球炼钢企业的期望。关于生产两个特殊碳钢和不锈钢等级的,提及的泵的使用允许从到达各种达涅利森特全世界安装不同的视点同时显着的结果(治疗高达200吨钢液)。由于事实上,在更换一个广泛普及和著名蒸汽喷射器的前泵技术与由干式机械真空泵(MVP)体现了最近开发的技术,在碳 - 氢的条件行之有效的冶金性能 - 氮硫脱除已多次获得,而在同一时间的会议客户端的有关,例如,运行费用和“按钮”的可用性预期。关于磨合成本就已经是众所周知的,通过将装有水环一个蒸汽喷射真空泵泵(WRP-SVP)与MVP脱气系统允许大约70-90%,运行成本降低。必须指出的是,装有MVP和SVP脱气系统之间的主要区别之一是它们设计抽吸能力:用于VD-VOD过程的MVP的通常提供特定抽吸容量1.0-1.5kg /小时之间的范围内/钢液吨,钢水而SVP它测距2.5-3.0kg /小时之间/吨。这种差异源自如果从比较高级副总裁,尤其是对于热尺寸高于100-120吨甚至虽然连年MVP的资本成本变得越来越有竞争力较高的MVP具体投资成本(欧元/公斤/小时)。从生产力和观点冶金点两个泵系统,得到尽管在相同的设备所设计的抽吸能力的差异几乎相同的结果,是有道理的,理由如下:整体VD设备的设计和工艺,当MVP被包括在所述植物具有以减小尽可能附加气体负载,例如,设备的泄漏和额外的氮/氩负荷泵进行了优化。下吸附能力直接与适当的维修活动的重要性增加链接。 SVP(如果不具备上游织物过滤器)具有补偿由所述蒸汽喷射器本体内部wallsv对于基于MVP-设备的灰尘沉积所有的体积dbwnstream主切断阀(MSOV)是一个渐进的性能损失部分或深开始VD-VOD处理前预先抽真空。由于采用了非常灵活的,模块化,冗余和维护方便设备的设计,发生的奇异机械泵随机问题,可以很容易地在不影响VD-VOD设备的可用性和性能的冶金解决。每当一个泵发生故障开始出现,这取决于MVP布局配置,无论是单数泵从剩余的泵通过关闭其打滑闭两个泵上游和下游的开/关阀或泵相关打滑从系统中分离出分离阀门。必须强调的是,有一个工作或多个泵隔离由于临时故障,钢的最终质量能够得到保证的还是当即便。与特定的关于VOD过程中,在非常短的总工艺时间已经重复地(比在CHMP〜1 58分钟下真空时间平均更小),同时保证最终的精炼不锈钢的预期要求的质量进行。此外,在几个VOD设备(从6吨高达1个l0t液态钢)一个有效的自动过程控制,例如氧气吹期间动态压力调节已经达到由于可控变速驱动与每个机械泵是假如。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号