首页> 外文会议>Society of Petroleum Engineers Reservoir Simulation Symposium >Assessing the Accuracy of History-Match Predictions and the Impact of Time-Lapse Seismic Data: A Case Study for the Harding Reservoir
【24h】

Assessing the Accuracy of History-Match Predictions and the Impact of Time-Lapse Seismic Data: A Case Study for the Harding Reservoir

机译:评估历史匹配预测的准确性以及时间流逝地震数据的影响:肺结坠水库的案例研究

获取原文

摘要

The oil industry benefits from reservoir models that are accurate predictors of future performance, but a “good” match to historical well data doesn’t guarantee a “good” prediction. This paper presents a case study from the Harding field in the North Sea, illustrating that we can greatly improve our chances of getting “good” predictions from our reservoir models by including time-lapse (4D) seismic data as part of the history matching process. The value of the surveillance is also discussed in the light of its use in improving reservoir performance prediction. The first part of the case study addresses the accuracy of prediction. The Harding field (Figure 1) started production in 1996, with the first time-lapse seismic survey being acquired in 2000. Using computer-assisted history matching techniques(1), multiple alternative reservoir models were generated that matched the well surveillance to 2000. In a blind test of predictive capability, forward predictions from these alternative models were compared with the subsequent production data from 2000 to 2003, allowing us to compare quantitatively the prediction quality against the history match quality for the selected cases. The time-lapse seismic data from 2000 was then included in the history matching process and the impact on the resulting prediction quality through 2003 was evaluated. Addition of the 4D seismic data enabled the selection of a subset of reservoir models which better predicted the (known) future of the field. The best hypotheses are those that make predictions that can be tested. If 4D seismic information is effective in reducing uncertainty, then there should be a way of making a quantitative estimate of the value of a future seismic survey. The impact and value of acquiring a future time lapse seismic survey, and a discussion around the metric for value of surveillance, are discussed in the second part of the case study.
机译:石油工业从水库模型中受益于未来性能的准确预测因素,但历史井数据的“好”匹配并不能保证“良好”的预测。本文介绍了北海哈丁场的案例研究,说明我们可以通过包括延时(4D)地震数据作为历史匹配过程的一部分,从我们的储层模型中获得“良好”预测的机会。鉴于改善水库性能预测,还讨论了监测的价值。案例研究的第一部分解决了预测的准确性。 Harding Field(图1)于1996年开始生产,2000年首次收购的延时地震测量。使用计算机辅助历史匹配技术(1),产生多种替代的储层模型,将良好的监视与2000匹配。在对预测能力的盲目测试中,将这些替代模型的前向预测与2000到2003年的后续生产数据进行了比较,允许我们定量地将预测质量与所选情况的历史匹配质量进行比较。然后将2000年的时间流逝地震数据包括在历史匹配过程中,并评估了2003年通过2003的产生预测质量的影响。添加4D地震数据,使得能够选择储层模型的子集,这更好地预测了该字段的(已知)未来的情况。最好的假设是那些可以测试的预测的假设。如果4D地震信息在减少不确定性方面是有效的,那么应该有一种方法来定量估计未来地震调查的价值。在案例研究的第二部分,讨论了收购未来时间流逝地震调查的影响和价值,以及监测价值的讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号