首页> 外文会议>Society of Petroleum Engineers Eastern Regional Meeting >Analysis of Production Data in Shale Gas Reservoirs: Rigorous Corrections for Fluid and Flow Properties
【24h】

Analysis of Production Data in Shale Gas Reservoirs: Rigorous Corrections for Fluid and Flow Properties

机译:页岩气藏生产数据分析:流体流动性能严格校正

获取原文

摘要

Analysis of long-term linear flow periods associated with shale gas production has received much attention in recent literature as a means of obtaining information about stimulation efficiency. However, the most popular methods for analysis (ex. square-root of time plot) can lead to incorrect characterization. Nobakht and Clarkson (2011a) demonstrated that the square root-time plot may not be a straight line for constant gas rate production linear flow and the non-linear shape may lead to incorrect flow regime identification. The square root-time plot is however a straight line for constant flowing pressure (Nobakht and Clarkson, 2011b). Ibrahim and Wattenbarger (2005; 2006) and Nobakht and Clarkson (2011b) showed that using the slope of square root-time plot, for constant flowing pressure constraint, leads to an overestimation of fracture half-length. Additional important considerations for shale gas analysis are non-Darcy flow and non-static reservoir properties. Clarkson et al. (2011) demonstrated that ignoring gas slippage effects, thought to be important in ultra-low permeability reservoirs, can cause errors in reservoir characterization. They incorporated slippage into pseudo-variables for production data analysis, as has been done with non-static permeability (Thompson et al., 2010). Finally, Nobakht et al. (2011) extended the methodology proposed by Nobakht and Clarkson (2011b) to properly analyze linear flow in the presence of slippage and desorption. The purpose of the current work is to evaluate the current methods for analyzing linear flow in shale gas reservoirs, and establish which method is the most accurate for reservoir characterization. First, recent studies addressing linear flow under constant flowing pressure and constant gas rate production are briefly reviewed. Then, a comparison among the above-mentioned methods for calculating fracture half-length or contacted matrix surface area is made. It is shown that Nobakht et al. (2011) method yields the fracture half-lengths that best match the expected values for constant flowing pressure. Finally, we present a method for analyzing linear flow for real production data, where neither flowing pressure nor gas rate is constant. The method is validated using three numerically-simulated cases. It is found that this method works well for the three cases provided.
机译:与页岩气产量相关的长期线性流动期分析在最近的文献中受到了很多关注,作为获取有关刺激效率的信息的手段。然而,最流行的分析方法(例如,时间图的平方根)可能导致表征不正确。 Nobakht和Clarkson(2011A)证明了方形曲线可能不是用于恒定气速生产线性流量的直线,并且非线性形状可能导致流动状态不正确。然而,平方根时曲线是恒定流动压力的直线(Nobakht和Clarkson,2011b)。 IBrahim和Wattenbarger(2005; 2006)和Nobakht和Clarkson(2011b)表明,使用平方根时曲线的斜率,用于恒定流动的压力约束,导致裂缝半长的高估。对页岩气体分析的其他重要考虑因素是非达西流动和非静态储层性质。 Clarkson等人。 (2011)展示忽略气体滑动效应,据思想在超低渗透储层中很重要,可能导致储层表征中的误差。它们并入伪变量的滑动以进行生产数据分析,正如非静态渗透率(Thompson等,2010)所做的那样。最后,Nobakht等人。 (2011)扩展了Nobakht和Clarkson(2011B)提出的方法,以便在滑动和解吸的存在下正确分析线性流动。目前作品的目的是评估分析页岩气藏线性流动的目前的方法,并建立哪种方法是储层表征最准确的方法。首先,简要介绍了解决恒定流动压力和恒定气体速率生产线性流量的最近研究。然后,进行上述用于计算裂缝半长或接触的基质表面积的方法的比较。表明nobakht等人。 (2011)方法产生最佳匹配恒定流动压力的预期值的裂缝半长度。最后,我们提出了一种用于分析用于实际生产数据的线性流量的方法,其中流动的压力和气速不恒定。使用三个数字模拟案例验证该方法。发现此方法适用于提供的三种情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号