首页> 外文会议>Society of Petroleum Engineers Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium >An Integration of Real Options and Utility Theory for Evaluation and Strategic Decision-Making in Oil Development and Production Projects
【24h】

An Integration of Real Options and Utility Theory for Evaluation and Strategic Decision-Making in Oil Development and Production Projects

机译:现实选择与实用理论的融合与策略决策在石油开发和生产项目中

获取原文

摘要

The results from the Discounted Cash Flow(DCF) are limited as a tool for decision-making in the petroleum industry because they don't properly take into account four important features of the modern investments:uncertainty, irreversibility,timing,and corporation's risk-aversion.Recent developments in real options and preference theories have allowed decision-makers to employ these two approaches separately in the process of valuation and decision-making of risky projects.This paper presents a model for valuation and decision-making integrating discounted cash flow,real options and preference theory and aims at answering the following questions:i)What is the current value of an oil project?ii) What is the optimal working interest in this project venture? iii)What are the criteria to select projects considering investment irreversibility,uncertainty and timing to implement decisions?This model is applied to valuation and decision-making of a project to produce oil from a deep-water reservoir and its results are compared to those of the traditional approach.Traditional model suggests that,as the project value is above its investment cost,the corporation should invest immediately and incur in 100%working interest.Contrarily, for an specific analysis,the integrated model suggest the corporation should invest as long as project current value is as large as 1.85 times investment cost and should take only 44.38%working interest,whereas partners fund and acquire the remaining 55.62%of the project.In general,results indicate that NPV tends to pay more attention on return and does not account properly for risk.Then,as the uncertainty (volatility)of strategic variables increase,the two models give more divergent results.
机译:从贴现现金流(DCF)限制结果,作为石油工业的决策工具,因为他们没有适当考虑现代投资的四个重要特点:不确定性,不可逆性,时间和公司的风险 - 厌恶。在真实选择和偏好理论中,允许决策者分别在估值和危险项目决策过程中雇用这两种方法。本文提出了估值和决策集成贴现现金流量的模型,真实的选择和偏好理论,旨在回答以下问题:i)石油项目的现值是什么?ii)该项目冒险的最佳工作兴趣是什么? iii)考虑投资不可逆转性,不确定性和时间来实施决定的项目选择项目是什么?该模型适用于估值和项目的估值和决策,从深水储层生产油,其结果与那些相比传统的方法。作为项目价值高于其投资成本的,该公司应立即投资并在100%的工作利息中投入。对于特定分析,综合模型建议该公司应该投资项目电流价值与投资成本大幅大,工作兴趣仅为44.38%,而合作伙伴资助并获取其余55.62%的项目。在一般,结果表明,NPV往往会收回更多的注意,并没有账户适当地进行风险。然后,作为战略变量的不确定性(波动性)增加,这两种模型提供了更多不同的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号