首页> 外文会议>Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition >Advanced Mud Gas Logging in Combination With Wireline Formation Testing and Geochemical Fingerprinting for an Improved Understanding of Reservoir Architecture
【24h】

Advanced Mud Gas Logging in Combination With Wireline Formation Testing and Geochemical Fingerprinting for an Improved Understanding of Reservoir Architecture

机译:先进的泥气空气登录与有线形成测试和地球化学指纹识别改善了解水库建筑的理解

获取原文

摘要

Understanding reservoir architecture is one of the critical factors in successful appraisal and development of any oil/gas field. Increasing drilling costs and environmental challenges has led to the development of alternative appraisal approaches that compliment the more costly and traditional methods such as the drill stem or production test. Therefore, the challenge of obtaining sufficient reservoir and fluid data from complex wells, in short time frames and at manageable costs, has pushed game changing improvements to both mud logging and wire line testing technologies. In the past, interpretation of wireline formation testing data (e.g., static pressure gradient analysis and downhole fluid analyses), PVT and geochemical fingerprinting have provided major inputs for reservoir modeling related to reservoir continuity. However, none of these tools or data sets provide hydrocarbon distributions or fingerprints during the drilling process of a given well; only after the well has reached final depth and LWD and e-logs have been obtained can one begin to speculate on such matters as reservoir continuity. Until recently, standard mud gas logging technologies did not offer the resolution and sensitivity necessary to provide quantitative hydrocarbon description. However, recent developments in advanced mud gas extractors and improved analytical detectors have increased the sensitivity, reliability and accuracy of mud gas fingerprinting. Thus, during the drilling of a given well, mud gas fluid fingerprints, or fluid facies, can be correlated within a given well and mapped to subsurface structural features such as faults and seals or different hydrocarbon bearing intervals. By providing this during the drilling process, anomalies observed in these fluid facies logs can be investigated in more detail during formation evaluation, sample collection, and geochemical fingerprinting techniques. In addition, by systematically combining and integrating these fundamentally different data streams, a much more robust picture of the reservoir fluid distribution becomes clear.
机译:了解水库建筑是成功评估和开发任何石油/天然气领域的关键因素之一。提高钻井成本和环境挑战导致开发替代评价方法,这些方法恭维更昂贵和传统的方法,如钻杆或生产测试。因此,在短时间框架和可管理成本中获得足够的储层和来自复杂井的流体数据的挑战,推动了泥浆测井和线线测试技术的游戏改善。过去,有线形成测试数据的解释(例如,静态压力梯度分析和井下流体分析),PVT和地球化学指纹识别提供了与储层连续性相关的储层建模的主要输入。然而,这些工具或数据集中都不是在给定良好的钻井过程中提供碳氢化合物分布或指纹;只有在井已经达到了最终深度,并且已经获得了LWD和电子日志,可以开始推测储层连续性等问题。直到最近,标准泥态伐木技术没有提供提供定量烃描述所需的分辨率和敏感性。然而,近期泥浆气提取器和改进的分析探测器的最新进程增加了泥气指纹纹理的灵敏度,可靠性和准确性。因此,在给定孔的钻孔期间,泥质气体液指纹或流体相在给出的井内可以相关,并映射到地下结构特征,例如故障和密封或不同的烃轴承间隔。通过在钻井过程中提供这一点,在形成评估,样品收集和地球化学指纹技术期间可以更详细地研究在这些流体相面上观察到的异常。另外,通过系统地组合和集成这些基本上不同的数据流,储存流体分布的更强大的图像变得清晰。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号