首页> 外文会议>Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition >MPD - Drilling Optimization Technology, Risk Management Tool, or Both?
【24h】

MPD - Drilling Optimization Technology, Risk Management Tool, or Both?

机译:MPD - 钻探优化技术,风险管理工具或两者兼而有之?

获取原文

摘要

Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) was introduced to offshore drilling decision-makers in 2003. To garner industry attention, it was taught in a “let me show you the money” style with a focus upon its ability to mitigate the types of drilling challenges that often manifest excessive drilling non-productive time (NPT), high mud costs and failure to reach the total objective with large enough hole for optimum well productivity. Hundreds of offshore applications have now been safely and effectively practiced from all types of offshore rigs. Compared to offset wells, NPT and mud costs are reduced significantly. Otherwise technically or economically un-drillable prospects have been drilled, increasing recoverable reserves in operator’s business units. There have been no reportable well control incidents where the root cause has been attributed to the technology itself or failure of its key enabling equipment. All operators’ business units who have practiced MPD, however conservatively as an early adopter, appear to have no reservation about applying it again on challenging prospects that may benefit from its hallmark – optimizing the drilling process by precise management of the wellbore pressure profile. There is no doubt that MPD has “showed the money”. However, its track record has demonstrated other strengths of significance in today’s drilling environment. MPD is being recognized as a risk management technology applicable to complex prospects whose drilling hazards, if not mitigated with best available technology, increase the risk of a well control scenario developing and time for “something else to go wrong”. Un-mitigated drilling hazards may also contribute to the well being over budget and behind schedule - a human factors climate which tempts short cuts and cost savings later in drilling program and plugging & abandonment (P&A) operations that are not peer-reviewed or thoroughly vetted for added risk and potential HSE consequences. This paper will provide evidence in the form of case studies that suggest the industry consider the positive effects on drilling costs and increased recoverable reserves as welcome by-products of MPD applications but not necessarily the primary objective of its application.
机译:2003年介绍了船舶压力钻井(MPD)。为了努力推出近海钻探决策者,才能讲授“让我向您展示金钱”的风格,重点关注其减轻钻探挑战类型的能力往往表现出过度钻井非生产时间(NPT),高泥土成本,未能达到足够大的洞的总物镜,以最佳的生产率。现在已经安全有效地从所有类型的离岸钻井平台上安全有效地练习了数百种海上应用。与偏移井相比,NPT和泥土成本显着减少。否则钻探技术上或经济不可钻出的前景,在运营商的业务部门中增加可收回的储备。没有可报告的良好控制事件,根本原因已归因于技术本身或其关键支持设备的故障。所有经营者的业务部门练习MPD,保守地作为早期采用者,似乎没有关于将其申请挑战可能从其霍尔马克受益的挑战性前景 - 优化钻井过程的挑战性展望。毫无疑问,MPD已经“展示了这笔钱”。然而,其轨道记录在今天的钻井环境中表现出其他重要的重要性。 MPD被认为是适用于复杂的前景的风险管理技术,如果没有获得最佳可用技术的钻孔危险,可以增加“别的东西出错”的井控制场景的风险。未缓解的钻探危害也可能有助于超过预算和落后时间表 - 一种人类因素气候,诱使钻探计划和堵漏和放弃(P&A)业务的速度和成本节约(P&A)操作,这些操作不会对同行评审或彻底审查增加风险和潜在的HSE后果。本文将以案例研究的形式提供证据,表明该行业考虑了对钻井成本的积极影响,并将可收回储量增加的可被动储量作为MPD应用的欢迎,但不一定是其申请的主要目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号