首页> 外文会议>Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing >How powerful are summary-based methods for identifying expression-trait associations under different genetic architectures?
【24h】

How powerful are summary-based methods for identifying expression-trait associations under different genetic architectures?

机译:基于摘要的方法是如何在不同的遗传架构下识别表达式关联的基于摘要方法?

获取原文

摘要

Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) have recently been employed as an approach that can draw upon the advantages of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and gene expression studies to identify genes associated with complex traits. Unlike standard GWAS, summary level data suffices for TWAS and offers improved statistical power. Two popular TWAS methods include either (a) imputing the cis genetic component of gene expression from smaller sized studies (using multi-SNP prediction or MP) into much larger effective sample sizes afforded by GWAS — TWAS-MP or (b) using summary-based Mendelian randomization — TWAS-SMR. Although these methods have been effective at detecting functional variants, it remains unclear how extensive variability in the genetic architecture of complex traits and diseases impacts TWAS results. Our goal was to investigate the different scenarios under which these methods yielded enough power to detect significant expression-trait associations. In this study, we conducted extensive simulations based on 6000 randomly chosen, unrelated Caucasian males from Geisinger's MyCode population to compare the power to detect cis expression-trait associations (within 500 kb of a gene) using the above-described approaches. To test TWAS across varying genetic backgrounds we simulated gene expression and phenotype using different quantitative trait loci per gene and cis-expression/trait heritability under genetic models that differentiate the effect of causality from that of pleiotropy. For each gene, on a training set ranging from 100 to 1000 individuals, we either (a) estimated regression coefficients with gene expression as the response using five different methods: LASSO, elastic net, Bayesian LASSO, Bayesian spike-slab, and Bayesian ridge regression or (b) performed eQTL analysis. We then sampled with replacement 50,000,150,000, and 300,000 individuals respectively from the testing set of the remaining 5000 individuals and conducted GWAS on each s
机译:转录组合的协会研究(TWA)最近被用作可以利用基因组关联研究(GWAS)和基因表达研究的优点,以鉴定与复杂性状相关的基因。与标准GWA不同,摘要级别数据足以适用于TWA,并提供改进的统计功率。两种流行的TWA方法包括将基因表达的顺式遗传成分(使用多SNP预测或MP)施加到较小的尺寸研究(使用多SNP预测或MP)中,以使用摘要提供GWAS-TWA-MP或(B)提供的更大的有效样本尺寸 - 基于Mendelian随机化 - TWA-SMR。虽然这些方法在检测功能变体上有效,但仍然尚不清楚复杂性状和疾病的遗传结构中的广泛变异性会影响TWA结果。我们的目标是调查这些方法产生足够的电力以检测显着的表达特征关联的不同情景。在这项研究中,我们基于来自景角的MyCode群体的6000次随机选择的无关的白种人男性进行了广泛的模拟,以使用上述方法比较检测CIS表达关联(在基因的500KB内)的能力。在不同的遗传背景上测试TWA,我们在遗传模型下使用不同的定量性状基因座和顺式表达/特性遗传性来模拟基因表达和表型,这些遗传模型将因果关系与肺炎的影响分解。对于每个基因,在训练集中的范围为100至1000个体,我们(a)具有基因表达的估计的回归系数作为使用五种不同方法的响应:套索,弹性网,贝叶斯套索,贝叶斯尖峰板和贝叶斯岭回归或(b)进行EQTL分析。然后,我们分别从剩余的5000个个人的测试集中进行更换50,000,150,000,以及300,000个个人,并在每个S上进行GWAS

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号