首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Grade-a-thons and Divide-and-Conquer: Effective Assessment at Scale
【24h】

Grade-a-thons and Divide-and-Conquer: Effective Assessment at Scale

机译:级别和征服和征服:规模有效评估

获取原文

摘要

This complete evidence-based practice paper will describe our successful grading and assessment practices of a large freshmen engineering course. In the Fall of 2016 we taught "Introduction to Engineering", a course designed to help students transition from high school to college and learn strategies to help them become successful engineering students. Over 70% of the students had not yet declared an engineering major but had intentions to transfer to an engineering major the following spring semester. This was a 1-credit hour, online and in-person hybrid class, technologically managed by a Learning Management Software (LMS). Over 700 students enrolled in the course, and our instructional team consisted of one Instructor, one graduate TA, and two undergraduate TAs. This paper reports evidence-based practice of two assessment methods, Divide-and-Conquer and Grade-a-lhons, that we used to successfully evaluate a large-enrollment course with small grading staff. The coursework was divided into two types of assignments: weekly homework and a final report. The design of the course was based on content that had been previously implemented at this large, midwestern institution, as well as best practices learned from introduction to engineering courses at other institutions. In particular, the final project was based on Ray Landis' work (Landis 2013). The weekly assignments were 1-page essay assignments. We asked students to reflect on the course's assigned in-person activities, reading, and videos and to create a personal plan that would set themselves up to becoming a successful engineering student. To the best of our understanding, this is the largest implementation of "Design Your Successful Engineering Path " that has been able to grade final reports at this scale.
机译:本完整的循证实践论文将描述我们的庞大新生工程课程的成功分级和评估实践。在2016年秋天,我们教授“工程介绍”,旨在帮助学生从高中到大学过渡的课程,并学习帮助他们成为成功的工程学生的策略。超过70%的学生尚未宣布工程专业,但有意图转移到以下春季学期的工程专业。这是一个1学分的小时,在线和在线混合类,由学习管理软件(LMS)技术管理。超过700名学生参加课程,我们的教学团队由一个教练,一个毕业生TA和两个本科TA组成。本文报告了两种评估方法,划分和征服和级别的证据实践,我们曾经成功地评估了一名小型课程员工。课程作业分为两种类型的作业:每周作业和最终报告。该课程的设计是基于先前在这个大型中西部机构实施的内容,以及从其他机构介绍工程课程的最佳实践。特别是,最终项目是基于Ray Landis的工作(Landis 2013)。每周任务是1页的文章任务。我们要求学生反思在课程中指定的内部活动,阅读和视频,并创建一个将自己的个人计划,即成为一个成功的工程学生。据我们所知,这是“设计您的成功工程路径”的最大实施,已经能够在此规模上级最终报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号