首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Alternative Approaches to Incorporate Design for Safety into Construction Engineering Curricula
【24h】

Alternative Approaches to Incorporate Design for Safety into Construction Engineering Curricula

机译:将安全设计融入建筑工程课程设计的替代方法

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

From both an ethical and practical viewpoint, civil and construction engineers must design safety into buildings, facilities, and the associated construction processes. The pre-construction phases of design clearly involve information processing, and therefore to change how design is practiced, one must change the knowledge civil and construction engineers use in their design decisions. The objective of this paper is to review design for safety (DfS) principles and practices, then identify and evaluate alternative approaches to incorporate DfS into construction engineering curricula. As BS and MS programs in construction engineering multiply, the appropriate inclusion of safety topics is an important decision for the program faculty. The specific purpose of this paper is to provide construction engineering faculty with a basis for this decision. The approach chosen by faculty at The University of Alabama (UA) is presented. In this paper, we will touch on both design for safety (facility, operators, maintainers, users, public) and design for construction safety (DfCS), the process of addressing construction site safety and health during the design process. An Internet search found one engineering course explicitly focused on DfS and DfCS offered at U.S. universities, and one master of engineering degree based on the related practice Prevention through Design. This course and program will be identified in the appropriate sections that follow. In addition, one finds short courses in DfS and DfCS taught either by consulting firms or university continuing education organizations. After a discussion of what drives engineering curriculum and course content changes, we identify specific options for "Design for Safety" course content. Several textbooks, handbooks, articles, websites, and consensus standards are identified as suitable sources for instructors to familiarize themselves with government, professional society, and academic information on DfS and DfCS. A mix of "good practice" processes, guidelines, checklists, tools, and case studies are available.
机译:从道德和实践的观点来看,民用和建筑工程师必须将安全性设计成建筑物,设施和相关的施工过程。设计的预施工阶段清楚地涉及信息处理,因此改变如何实施设计,必须改变知识民用和建筑工程师的设计决策。本文的目的是审查安全性(DFS)原则和实践的设计,然后识别和评估替代方法,将DF纳入建筑工程课程。随着建筑工程繁殖的BS和MS程序,安全主题的适当纳入是对计划教师的重要决定。本文的具体目的是提供建筑工程学院,以此决定为基础。提出了由阿拉巴马大学(UA)所选择的方法。在本文中,我们将触及安全(设施,运营商,维护者,用户,公共)和建筑安全性(DFC)设计的设计,解决设计过程中的施工现场安全和健康的过程。互联网搜索发现一个工程课程明确地专注于美国大学提供的DFS和DFC,以及通过设计的相关实践预防的一个工程学位硕士。本课程和计划将在遵循的适当部分中识别。此外,还有一个通过咨询公司或大学持续教育组织教授DFS和DFC的短期课程。在讨论开启工程课程和课程内容的变化后,我们确定了“安全”课程内容的“设计”的特定选项。若干教科书,手册,文章,网站和共识标准被确定为教师熟悉政府,专业社会以及DFS和DFCS的学术信息的合适来源。有一个“良好做法”过程,指南,清单,工具和案例研究的组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号