首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >No-cost Implementation of Electronic Lab Notebooks in an Intro Engineering Design Course
【24h】

No-cost Implementation of Electronic Lab Notebooks in an Intro Engineering Design Course

机译:简介工程设计课程中电子实验室笔记本的无需成本实施

获取原文

摘要

In our "Introduction to Engineering Design" course, we had traditionally used paper-based Lab Notebooks (LN). In a three-ring binder, students would keep records of their work, including printout of spreadsheets, controller programs, etc. However, many students expressed reluctance to this routine, part of the reason being the cost and inconvenience of printing. They regarded the LN and, by association, the concept of engineering documentation as a pointless chore, rather than an integral component of their learning experience. In response, we considered electronic LN (eLN), and opted to use the tools at hand: Blackboard Learn (BBL) and Google Drive (GD). A comparison test was conducted with three sections of the course. One section used traditional paper-based LN. In the other two sections, computer-generated contents were saved in their original format, and non-computer-generated contents were digitized and saved. Students were to organize these in an electronic "folder", which essentially served as their eLN. Between the two sections that used eLN, one was to submit the contents via BBL, while the other was to maintain the contents in a GD folder that the instructor shared with each student. The main objectives were to explore the feasibility of replacing paper binders with electronic folders, and to identify technical and managerial characteristics of using BBL and GD as platform. The assessment was based on analysis of responses to an end-of-semester survey, analysis of the quality and completeness of the LN, and anecdotal account of student comments and reactions. We found that both implementations of eLN were feasible. The BBL method resulted in somewhat better completeness than the other methods. GD was less effective than the other two methods as a mechanism to submit assignments; on average, those who used GD were more likely to miss the deadline or submit incomplete work. Although powerful, GD seemed almost too flexible and complicated to a number of students whose computer literacy was still developing. In following semesters, we plan to use BBL as main platform, supplemented by GD.
机译:在我们的“工程设计介绍”课程中,我们传统上使用了基于纸张的实验室笔记本电脑(LN)。在三环粘合剂中,学生将记录他们的工作,包括电子表格,控制器程序等的打印输出,但是,许多学生对这一例程表示不情愿,部分原因是印刷的成本和不便。他们认为LN,并通过协会,工程文档的概念作为无意义的苦难,而不是他们学习经历的一个组成部分。作为回应,我们考虑了电子LN(eln),并选择使用手头的工具:黑板学习(BBL)和Google Drive(GD)。比较测试是用课程的三个部分进行的。一节使用传统纸张的LN。在另外两个部分中,计算机生成的内容以原始格式保存,并且非计算机生成的内容被数字化并保存。学生将在电子“文件夹”中组织这些,基本上担任他们的eln。在使用ELN的两部分之间,一个是通过BBL提交内容,而另一个是将讲师与每个学生共享的GD文件夹中的内容维持。主要目标是探讨用电子文件夹替换纸粘合剂的可行性,并识别使用BBL和GD作为平台的技术和管理特性。评估基于对学期结束调查的答复分析,分析LN的质量和完整性以及学生评论和反应的轶事叙述。我们发现ell的两种实现都是可行的。 BBL方法导致比其他方法有些完整性。 GD比其他两种方法效果较低,作为提交任务的机制;平均而言,那些使用GD的人更有可能错过截止日期或提交不完整的工作。虽然强大,GD似乎几乎太灵活,并且对许多学生仍在开发的许多学生。在以下学期,我们计划使用BBL作为主平台,由GD补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号